We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

HospiMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News Medica 2024 AI Critical Care Surgical Techniques Patient Care Health IT Point of Care Business Focus

Lung Ultrasound Better Than Chest X-Ray for Diagnosis of COVID-19, Finds Study

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 11 Nov 2020
A new study has found that portable ultrasound scans are more sensitive than X-rays for the preliminary detection of atypical pneumonia in patients who may have COVID-19.

Physicians have been trying to figure out the best approach to initial imaging in patients who may have COVID-19. In a presentation at the virtual American College of Emergency Physicians meeting, Ryan C. Gibbons, MD, of the Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University (Philadelphia, PA, USA) reported findings from a study of possible COVID-19 patients who presented to the emergency department (ED). Gibbons and his team prospectively tracked 143 consecutive potential COVID-19 patients who presented at the ED. Each patient was screened via handheld ultrasound and portable X-ray. Those at high-risk, and those who showed abnormal findings, were sent for CT scans.

Image: Mindray DP-50 Digital Ultrasonic Diagnostic Imaging System (Photo courtesy of Mindray)
Image: Mindray DP-50 Digital Ultrasonic Diagnostic Imaging System (Photo courtesy of Mindray)

The physicians interpreted 99 ultrasound scans and 73 X-rays as positive. The CT scans confirmed that 75% (95% CI 66.0-83.2) of these patients had atypical pneumonia. This number was especially high because the patients were tracked during a period of widespread infection, according to Gibbons. They found the specificity to be 33.3% (95% CI 16.5-54.0) for ultrasound and 44.4% (95% CI 25.5-64.7) for X-ray. The study found that ultrasound had a sensitivity of 97.6% (95% CI 91.6-99.7) as compared to 69.9% (95% CI 58.8-79.5) for X-ray.

Based on these findings, Gibbons has urged an "ultrasound first" approach to screening. "It's a valuable tool to quickly separate the lower-risk from higher-risk patients and move those lower-risk patients out," he told MedPage Today following his online presentation. Ultrasound scans, which can easily be performed at bedside with handheld devices, are also more convenient than X-rays, according to Gibbons. Physicians use "a handheld probe that plugs into an iPad. You can be in and out of a room in under a few minutes and sanitization is very quick. And we're not transporting a patient to and from X-ray or having to wait for a portable X-ray machine," he said.

Related Links:
Temple University


Gold Member
12-Channel ECG
CM1200B
New
Gold Member
X-Ray QA Meter
T3 AD Pro
New
Diagnosis Display System
C1216W
New
LED Surgical Light
Convelar 1670 LED+/1675 LED+/1677 LED+

Latest COVID-19 News

Low-Cost System Detects SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Hospital Air Using High-Tech Bubbles

World's First Inhalable COVID-19 Vaccine Approved in China

COVID-19 Vaccine Patch Fights SARS-CoV-2 Variants Better than Needles