Heart Association Issues Statement on Understanding Radiation Risks Before Cardiac Imaging
|
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 16 Oct 2014 |

Image: The American Heart Association issued a statement that patients need to be informed on radiation risks before undergoing cardiac imaging (Photo courtesy of AHA - The American Heart Association).
People should understand why a heart-imaging test is needed before undergoing the procedure, including the benefits and risks involved, such as the potential long-term risk from radiation exposure, advises a new scientific statement.
The statement was published online, before print, on September 29, 2014, in the American Heart Association’s (AHA; Dallas, TX, USA) journal Circulation. “When medical imaging is being considered, patients should feel very comfortable asking how the test will help them and the possible risks, including radiation-related risks,” said Reza Fazel, MD, MSc, chair of the writing committee for the statement and an AHA volunteer currently serving on the Joint Cardiac Imaging Committee of the AHA’s Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology.
As technology has evolved, imaging modalities have become an increasingly important application in diagnosing and treating patients with heart disease. However, the rising use has resulted in higher radiation exposure during the last 20 years. Heart imaging now accounts for nearly 40% of the radiation exposure patients receive from medical tests, according to the statement.
“In general, the radiation-related risk of any imaging test to an individual patient is very small and, when the test is clinically appropriate, the benefits of the test typically far outweigh any potential risks,” said Dr. Fazel, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA).
Some questions that may help a patient understand the risks and benefits are: (1) how will this test help diagnose or treat my heart problem? (2) Will the results of this test change the recommended treatment? (3) Are there other techniques to get the information without using radiation? (4) How much radiation exposure may occur? (5) How could that affect my chance of developing cancer later in life? (6) Lastly, how does that risk compare to the risk from other common activities?
The most typically used heart and blood vessel imaging procedures using radiation are nuclear stress tests, cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopy (a real-time X-ray technology used to guide catheter and device placement during heart catheterization and tests for heart rhythm abnormalities). Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging do not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
The new statement also provides guidance for the training of professionals who order or administer cardiac imaging tests. Clinicians planning imaging tests should understand when each type of test is appropriate, the typical average radiation dose and the potential risks. In deciding the best imaging method to use, the clinician should also consider the test’s diagnostic accuracy, potential risks, cost, availability, and the patient’s convenience.
“Radiation-related risk is one of the factors that should be considered in the decision to use cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation, particularly in younger patients in whom the potential risk of radiation exposure is thought to be higher,” Dr. Fazel said.
Clinicians who perform cardiac imaging should understand current methods required to select the optimal dose of radiation—using enough to produce high-quality imaged, not significantly more than that. They should also know how to minimize radiation exposure to staff, according to the statement.
Related Links:
American Heart Association
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
The statement was published online, before print, on September 29, 2014, in the American Heart Association’s (AHA; Dallas, TX, USA) journal Circulation. “When medical imaging is being considered, patients should feel very comfortable asking how the test will help them and the possible risks, including radiation-related risks,” said Reza Fazel, MD, MSc, chair of the writing committee for the statement and an AHA volunteer currently serving on the Joint Cardiac Imaging Committee of the AHA’s Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology.
As technology has evolved, imaging modalities have become an increasingly important application in diagnosing and treating patients with heart disease. However, the rising use has resulted in higher radiation exposure during the last 20 years. Heart imaging now accounts for nearly 40% of the radiation exposure patients receive from medical tests, according to the statement.
“In general, the radiation-related risk of any imaging test to an individual patient is very small and, when the test is clinically appropriate, the benefits of the test typically far outweigh any potential risks,” said Dr. Fazel, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA).
Some questions that may help a patient understand the risks and benefits are: (1) how will this test help diagnose or treat my heart problem? (2) Will the results of this test change the recommended treatment? (3) Are there other techniques to get the information without using radiation? (4) How much radiation exposure may occur? (5) How could that affect my chance of developing cancer later in life? (6) Lastly, how does that risk compare to the risk from other common activities?
The most typically used heart and blood vessel imaging procedures using radiation are nuclear stress tests, cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopy (a real-time X-ray technology used to guide catheter and device placement during heart catheterization and tests for heart rhythm abnormalities). Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging do not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
The new statement also provides guidance for the training of professionals who order or administer cardiac imaging tests. Clinicians planning imaging tests should understand when each type of test is appropriate, the typical average radiation dose and the potential risks. In deciding the best imaging method to use, the clinician should also consider the test’s diagnostic accuracy, potential risks, cost, availability, and the patient’s convenience.
“Radiation-related risk is one of the factors that should be considered in the decision to use cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation, particularly in younger patients in whom the potential risk of radiation exposure is thought to be higher,” Dr. Fazel said.
Clinicians who perform cardiac imaging should understand current methods required to select the optimal dose of radiation—using enough to produce high-quality imaged, not significantly more than that. They should also know how to minimize radiation exposure to staff, according to the statement.
Related Links:
American Heart Association
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Latest Critical Care News
- Wearable Microneedle Patch Monitors Antibiotic Levels in Real Time
- AI Analysis of EMS Calls Aids Pediatric Trauma Decision-Making
- Noninvasive Silk Sensor Could Transform Care for Premature Infants
- AI Identifies Hidden Stroke Risk Through At-Home Behavior Patterns
- Home Exercise Program Advances Recovery After Aortic Dissection
- Multi-Night Home Monitoring Reduces Sleep Apnea Misdiagnosis
- AI-Guided Outreach System Improves Colorectal Cancer Screening
- FDA Breakthrough Device Targets Brain Hemorrhage Complications
- RFA Device Gains FDA Clearance for Minimally Invasive Thyroid Nodule Ablation
- ECG-Based Screening Framework Aims to Standardize Cardiac Evaluation in Military Personnel
- Inhaled Analgesic Matches Morphine for Prehospital Trauma Pain
- FDA Clears Tongue-Applied Neuromodulation System for Stroke Gait Rehabilitation
- Eye Test May Predict Return of Consciousness After Severe Brain Injury
- Medical Drone Program Improves Blood Access and Patient Survival
- AI System Enables Real-Time Sepsis Quality Assessment and Improves Adherence
- AI Detects Hidden ECG Marker of Sudden Cardiac Death
Channels
Artificial Intelligence
view channel
AI Tool Predicts Chronic Kidney Disease Risk in Diabetes
Chronic kidney disease is a common and serious complication of type 2 diabetes and often progresses without obvious early symptoms, increasing morbidity and straining health systems. Many risk models were... Read more
AI Trends Report Guides Responsible, Effective Healthcare Deployment
Hospitals are under growing pressure to adopt artificial intelligence tools that improve safety, efficiency, and continuity of care without compromising quality. At the same time, clinicians need clearer... Read moreCritical Care
view channel
Wearable Microneedle Patch Monitors Antibiotic Levels in Real Time
Therapeutic drug monitoring for agents with narrow therapeutic windows often relies on intermittent blood draws and laboratory analysis, providing only snapshots of exposure. Real-time, minimally invasive... Read more
AI Analysis of EMS Calls Aids Pediatric Trauma Decision-Making
Accurate trauma triage is difficult when decisions rely on brief, noisy reports from emergency medical services (EMS). Misclassification can delay lifesaving interventions or lead to overuse of critical... Read moreSurgical Techniques
view channel
AI-Designed Microneedle Patch Accelerates Diabetic Wound Healing
Chronic diabetic wounds are slow to heal and prone to infection, often leading to repeated procedures and prolonged care. Standard closure methods bring wound edges together but do not adapt to changing... Read more
Focused Ultrasound System Gains CE Mark for Liver Tumor Treatment
Liver tumors remain a major global health challenge, and many patients are not candidates for resection or conventional thermal ablation. Tumor location, underlying liver disease, and other clinical factors... Read morePatient Care
view channel
AI Avatar Doctor Improves Patient Understanding Before Radiotherapy
Radiation oncology consultations require patients to grasp complex concepts quickly, yet anxiety and information overload often undermine understanding and informed consent. Poor comprehension can also... Read more
Wearable Sleep Data Predict Adherence to Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a long-term lung disorder that makes breathing difficult and often disturbs sleep, reducing energy for daily activities. Limited engagement in pulmonary... Read moreHealth IT
view channel
Weekly Remote Symptom Monitoring Improves Symptom Control in Advanced Cancer
Patients receiving treatment for advanced cancer often struggle with uncontrolled symptoms and fragmented communication with clinicians. These gaps can impair daily function, increase emergency department... Read more
Digital Heart Model Supports Targeted Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation is an erratic, quivering heartbeat and a leading cause of stroke. Catheter ablation is widely used to interrupt arrhythmogenic tissue, yet many patients—especially with persistent ... Read morePoint of Care
view channel
New Brain Ultrasound Platform Enables Bedside Postoperative Imaging
Transporting postoperative patients for CT or MRI can create operational burdens, delays, and disruptions in care. Bedside visualization may help reduce transport demands, lower radiation exposure, and... Read more
Handheld Ultrasound Expands Point-of-Care Imaging Access in Brazil
Rapid access to diagnostic imaging is essential across hospitals, emergency departments, clinics, and municipal health systems, but large markets still face uneven availability, particularly in rural regions.... Read moreBusiness
view channel







