Heart Association Issues Statement on Understanding Radiation Risks Before Cardiac Imaging
|
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 16 Oct 2014 |

Image: The American Heart Association issued a statement that patients need to be informed on radiation risks before undergoing cardiac imaging (Photo courtesy of AHA - The American Heart Association).
People should understand why a heart-imaging test is needed before undergoing the procedure, including the benefits and risks involved, such as the potential long-term risk from radiation exposure, advises a new scientific statement.
The statement was published online, before print, on September 29, 2014, in the American Heart Association’s (AHA; Dallas, TX, USA) journal Circulation. “When medical imaging is being considered, patients should feel very comfortable asking how the test will help them and the possible risks, including radiation-related risks,” said Reza Fazel, MD, MSc, chair of the writing committee for the statement and an AHA volunteer currently serving on the Joint Cardiac Imaging Committee of the AHA’s Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology.
As technology has evolved, imaging modalities have become an increasingly important application in diagnosing and treating patients with heart disease. However, the rising use has resulted in higher radiation exposure during the last 20 years. Heart imaging now accounts for nearly 40% of the radiation exposure patients receive from medical tests, according to the statement.
“In general, the radiation-related risk of any imaging test to an individual patient is very small and, when the test is clinically appropriate, the benefits of the test typically far outweigh any potential risks,” said Dr. Fazel, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA).
Some questions that may help a patient understand the risks and benefits are: (1) how will this test help diagnose or treat my heart problem? (2) Will the results of this test change the recommended treatment? (3) Are there other techniques to get the information without using radiation? (4) How much radiation exposure may occur? (5) How could that affect my chance of developing cancer later in life? (6) Lastly, how does that risk compare to the risk from other common activities?
The most typically used heart and blood vessel imaging procedures using radiation are nuclear stress tests, cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopy (a real-time X-ray technology used to guide catheter and device placement during heart catheterization and tests for heart rhythm abnormalities). Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging do not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
The new statement also provides guidance for the training of professionals who order or administer cardiac imaging tests. Clinicians planning imaging tests should understand when each type of test is appropriate, the typical average radiation dose and the potential risks. In deciding the best imaging method to use, the clinician should also consider the test’s diagnostic accuracy, potential risks, cost, availability, and the patient’s convenience.
“Radiation-related risk is one of the factors that should be considered in the decision to use cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation, particularly in younger patients in whom the potential risk of radiation exposure is thought to be higher,” Dr. Fazel said.
Clinicians who perform cardiac imaging should understand current methods required to select the optimal dose of radiation—using enough to produce high-quality imaged, not significantly more than that. They should also know how to minimize radiation exposure to staff, according to the statement.
Related Links:
American Heart Association
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
The statement was published online, before print, on September 29, 2014, in the American Heart Association’s (AHA; Dallas, TX, USA) journal Circulation. “When medical imaging is being considered, patients should feel very comfortable asking how the test will help them and the possible risks, including radiation-related risks,” said Reza Fazel, MD, MSc, chair of the writing committee for the statement and an AHA volunteer currently serving on the Joint Cardiac Imaging Committee of the AHA’s Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology.
As technology has evolved, imaging modalities have become an increasingly important application in diagnosing and treating patients with heart disease. However, the rising use has resulted in higher radiation exposure during the last 20 years. Heart imaging now accounts for nearly 40% of the radiation exposure patients receive from medical tests, according to the statement.
“In general, the radiation-related risk of any imaging test to an individual patient is very small and, when the test is clinically appropriate, the benefits of the test typically far outweigh any potential risks,” said Dr. Fazel, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA).
Some questions that may help a patient understand the risks and benefits are: (1) how will this test help diagnose or treat my heart problem? (2) Will the results of this test change the recommended treatment? (3) Are there other techniques to get the information without using radiation? (4) How much radiation exposure may occur? (5) How could that affect my chance of developing cancer later in life? (6) Lastly, how does that risk compare to the risk from other common activities?
The most typically used heart and blood vessel imaging procedures using radiation are nuclear stress tests, cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopy (a real-time X-ray technology used to guide catheter and device placement during heart catheterization and tests for heart rhythm abnormalities). Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging do not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
The new statement also provides guidance for the training of professionals who order or administer cardiac imaging tests. Clinicians planning imaging tests should understand when each type of test is appropriate, the typical average radiation dose and the potential risks. In deciding the best imaging method to use, the clinician should also consider the test’s diagnostic accuracy, potential risks, cost, availability, and the patient’s convenience.
“Radiation-related risk is one of the factors that should be considered in the decision to use cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation, particularly in younger patients in whom the potential risk of radiation exposure is thought to be higher,” Dr. Fazel said.
Clinicians who perform cardiac imaging should understand current methods required to select the optimal dose of radiation—using enough to produce high-quality imaged, not significantly more than that. They should also know how to minimize radiation exposure to staff, according to the statement.
Related Links:
American Heart Association
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Latest Critical Care News
- Optical Brain Monitoring Predicts Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Preterm Infants
- AI Tool Identifies Children With Pneumonia Requiring Hospital Care
- AI Ultrasound System Improves Safety of Blood–Brain Barrier Opening
- CE-Marked Smartphone AI Enables Autonomous Skin Cancer Assessment at Point of Care
- Handheld Optical Device Screens for Early Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants
- Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring Linked to Fewer Cardiovascular Events
- Tiny Wearable Patch Tracks Heart and Respiratory Changes at Home
- Smartphone Heart Rhythm App Reduces Unnecessary Cardioversion Procedures
- AI-Guided Mammogram Triage Speeds Same-Day Breast Cancer Workup
- Handheld ECG Algorithm Shows Promise for At-Home Heart Attack Risk Assessment
- Bedside CSF Monitor Detects Early Infection in Fluid Drains
- Wearable Ultrasound Patch Noninvasively Paces Heart to Stabilize Arrhythmias
- New Practice Guidance Supports Prostatic Artery Embolization for BPH Symptoms
- AI ECG Tool Detects Cardiac Amyloidosis for Early Screening
- Cuffless Wearable Enables Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring for Hypertension Care
- AI-Guided System Supports Cardiac Ultrasound Training on Cart-Based Systems
Channels
Artificial Intelligence
view channel
New AI ECG Tool Detects Early Heart Disease
Heart disease remains a leading cause of premature death, claiming almost 18 million lives each year. Early detection is crucial because timely intervention can change prognosis and conserve resources.... Read more
AI Platform Supports Noninvasive Remote Hemodynamic Monitoring in Heart Failure
Heart failure remains a leading cause of hospitalization in adults over 65, affecting more than 6.7 million people in the U.S. Clinicians often lose visibility into hemodynamic deterioration once patients... Read moreCritical Care
view channel
Optical Brain Monitoring Predicts Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Preterm Infants
Premature birth, defined as delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, increases the risk of language, motor, and cognitive delays, yet many late preterm infants receive limited follow-up. Clinicians currently... Read more
AI Tool Identifies Children With Pneumonia Requiring Hospital Care
Pneumonia is the leading infectious killer of children under five, causing nearly one million deaths each year. Early recognition of severe cases in primary care is difficult, and current international... Read more
AI Ultrasound System Improves Safety of Blood–Brain Barrier Opening
The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a protective interface that prevents most drugs and diagnostic molecules from reaching brain tissue. This safeguard complicates treatment and monitoring of brain tumors... Read more
CE-Marked Smartphone AI Enables Autonomous Skin Cancer Assessment at Point of Care
Skin cancer is among the most common malignancies in Europe, with more than one million non-melanoma cases and over 100,000 melanoma diagnoses each year. Early detection is critical for improving outcomes,... Read moreSurgical Techniques
view channel
Minimally Invasive Procedure Reduces Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
Knee osteoarthritis causes chronic inflammation, stiffness, and pain that impair mobility and daily function. Many patients exhaust injections and medication without durable benefit yet are not ready or... Read more
Computer-Assisted Vacuum Thrombectomy System Cleared for Stroke Care
Effective clot removal is central to acute ischemic stroke care, as incomplete extraction can increase the risk of serious complications, disability, or death. Interventional teams continue to seek approaches... Read more
Near-Infrared Exoscope Enables Real-Time Perfusion Assessment and Lymphatic Mapping in Open Surgery
Open surgery can make it difficult to assess tissue perfusion and lymphatic flow in real time, limiting intraoperative certainty. Near-infrared fluorescence with indocyanine green reveals details not visible... Read morePatient Care
view channel
AI Avatar Doctor Improves Patient Understanding Before Radiotherapy
Radiation oncology consultations require patients to grasp complex concepts quickly, yet anxiety and information overload often undermine understanding and informed consent. Poor comprehension can also... Read more
Wearable Sleep Data Predict Adherence to Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a long-term lung disorder that makes breathing difficult and often disturbs sleep, reducing energy for daily activities. Limited engagement in pulmonary... Read moreHealth IT
view channel
AI Tool Screens for Primary Aldosteronism Using Routine EHR Data
Primary aldosteronism, an adrenal disorder that causes excess aldosterone and secondary hypertension, is frequently missed despite its association with cardiovascular complications. Underdiagnosis can... Read moreAI-Enabled ECG Software Predicts One-Year Atrial Fibrillation Risk
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with increased risks of stroke, heart failure, and death. Detection remains challenging because AF is often asymptomatic... Read morePoint of Care
view channel
Handheld AI Device for Point-of-Care Skin Lesion Assessment Receives CE Mark
DermaSensor (Miami, FL, USA) has received a Class IIb CE Mark for its handheld DermaSensor device, marking the start of the company’s global expansion strategy. The certification demonstrates conformity... Read more
Portable Immunoassay System Advances Toward Point-of-Care Biomarker Testing
Proxim Diagnostics Corp. (Santa Clara, CA, USA) has announced that its Profile System, a handheld point-of-care immunoassay platform, has completed development. The milestone includes completion... Read more
Portable MRI System Accelerates Emergency Brain Imaging and Triage
Emergency departments frequently face delays accessing conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with suspected neurological emergencies. Such waits can slow triage, prolong boarding,... Read more







