Heart Association Issues Statement on Understanding Radiation Risks Before Cardiac Imaging
|
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 16 Oct 2014 |

Image: The American Heart Association issued a statement that patients need to be informed on radiation risks before undergoing cardiac imaging (Photo courtesy of AHA - The American Heart Association).
People should understand why a heart-imaging test is needed before undergoing the procedure, including the benefits and risks involved, such as the potential long-term risk from radiation exposure, advises a new scientific statement.
The statement was published online, before print, on September 29, 2014, in the American Heart Association’s (AHA; Dallas, TX, USA) journal Circulation. “When medical imaging is being considered, patients should feel very comfortable asking how the test will help them and the possible risks, including radiation-related risks,” said Reza Fazel, MD, MSc, chair of the writing committee for the statement and an AHA volunteer currently serving on the Joint Cardiac Imaging Committee of the AHA’s Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology.
As technology has evolved, imaging modalities have become an increasingly important application in diagnosing and treating patients with heart disease. However, the rising use has resulted in higher radiation exposure during the last 20 years. Heart imaging now accounts for nearly 40% of the radiation exposure patients receive from medical tests, according to the statement.
“In general, the radiation-related risk of any imaging test to an individual patient is very small and, when the test is clinically appropriate, the benefits of the test typically far outweigh any potential risks,” said Dr. Fazel, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA).
Some questions that may help a patient understand the risks and benefits are: (1) how will this test help diagnose or treat my heart problem? (2) Will the results of this test change the recommended treatment? (3) Are there other techniques to get the information without using radiation? (4) How much radiation exposure may occur? (5) How could that affect my chance of developing cancer later in life? (6) Lastly, how does that risk compare to the risk from other common activities?
The most typically used heart and blood vessel imaging procedures using radiation are nuclear stress tests, cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopy (a real-time X-ray technology used to guide catheter and device placement during heart catheterization and tests for heart rhythm abnormalities). Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging do not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
The new statement also provides guidance for the training of professionals who order or administer cardiac imaging tests. Clinicians planning imaging tests should understand when each type of test is appropriate, the typical average radiation dose and the potential risks. In deciding the best imaging method to use, the clinician should also consider the test’s diagnostic accuracy, potential risks, cost, availability, and the patient’s convenience.
“Radiation-related risk is one of the factors that should be considered in the decision to use cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation, particularly in younger patients in whom the potential risk of radiation exposure is thought to be higher,” Dr. Fazel said.
Clinicians who perform cardiac imaging should understand current methods required to select the optimal dose of radiation—using enough to produce high-quality imaged, not significantly more than that. They should also know how to minimize radiation exposure to staff, according to the statement.
Related Links:
American Heart Association
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
The statement was published online, before print, on September 29, 2014, in the American Heart Association’s (AHA; Dallas, TX, USA) journal Circulation. “When medical imaging is being considered, patients should feel very comfortable asking how the test will help them and the possible risks, including radiation-related risks,” said Reza Fazel, MD, MSc, chair of the writing committee for the statement and an AHA volunteer currently serving on the Joint Cardiac Imaging Committee of the AHA’s Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology.
As technology has evolved, imaging modalities have become an increasingly important application in diagnosing and treating patients with heart disease. However, the rising use has resulted in higher radiation exposure during the last 20 years. Heart imaging now accounts for nearly 40% of the radiation exposure patients receive from medical tests, according to the statement.
“In general, the radiation-related risk of any imaging test to an individual patient is very small and, when the test is clinically appropriate, the benefits of the test typically far outweigh any potential risks,” said Dr. Fazel, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA).
Some questions that may help a patient understand the risks and benefits are: (1) how will this test help diagnose or treat my heart problem? (2) Will the results of this test change the recommended treatment? (3) Are there other techniques to get the information without using radiation? (4) How much radiation exposure may occur? (5) How could that affect my chance of developing cancer later in life? (6) Lastly, how does that risk compare to the risk from other common activities?
The most typically used heart and blood vessel imaging procedures using radiation are nuclear stress tests, cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopy (a real-time X-ray technology used to guide catheter and device placement during heart catheterization and tests for heart rhythm abnormalities). Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging do not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
The new statement also provides guidance for the training of professionals who order or administer cardiac imaging tests. Clinicians planning imaging tests should understand when each type of test is appropriate, the typical average radiation dose and the potential risks. In deciding the best imaging method to use, the clinician should also consider the test’s diagnostic accuracy, potential risks, cost, availability, and the patient’s convenience.
“Radiation-related risk is one of the factors that should be considered in the decision to use cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation, particularly in younger patients in whom the potential risk of radiation exposure is thought to be higher,” Dr. Fazel said.
Clinicians who perform cardiac imaging should understand current methods required to select the optimal dose of radiation—using enough to produce high-quality imaged, not significantly more than that. They should also know how to minimize radiation exposure to staff, according to the statement.
Related Links:
American Heart Association
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Latest Critical Care News
- Graphene-Based Material Selectively Eliminates Bacteria While Sparing Human Cells
- Flexible Plastic Film Uses Nanostructures to Destroy Viruses
- Dried Platelet Biologic Reduces Hemorrhage After Traumatic Brain Injury
- Minimally Invasive Probe Measures Key Metabolic Markers Simultaneously
- AI Expands Across Heart Failure Care Continuum to Improve Management
- Wearable Cardiac Monitor with Cellular Transmission Enhances Remote Arrhythmia Detection
- Microneedle Sensor Enables Continuous Monitoring of Drug Clearance
- 3D Brain Imaging Marker Predicts Surgical Outcomes in Dementia-Causing Hydrocephalus
- Printed Artificial Neurons Stimulate Natural Brain Circuits
- Review Advances Precision Care Pathway for Meningioma Management
- Synthetic Biology Approach Enables On-Demand Liver Tissue Growth
- Bioinspired Imaging System Identifies Cancerous Lymph Nodes Intraoperatively
- Portable AI Device Enables Low-Cost Screening for Anterior Eye Diseases
- FDA-Cleared ECG Software Powers Real-Time Cardiac Monitoring at Scale
- Collaboration Brings Continuous Monitoring to Metabolic Care Management
- Low-Frequency Wireless Sensor Monitors Arterial Stiffening and Blood Pressure
Channels
Artificial Intelligence
view channel
AI Model Uses Eye Imaging to Identify Risk of Major Systemic Diseases
Early detection of systemic disease risk remains a persistent challenge in population health screening. Cardiometabolic conditions such as diabetes, heart disease, and stroke often progress without symptoms... Read more
AI Platform Interprets Real-Time Wearable Data for Parkinson’s Management
Parkinson’s disease presents fluctuating motor and non-motor symptoms that complicate day-to-day self-management and clinical decision-making. Care teams require timely, longitudinal insight into medication... Read moreCritical Care
view channelGraphene-Based Material Selectively Eliminates Bacteria While Sparing Human Cells
Drug-resistant bacterial infections continue to complicate wound management and device-associated care, where persistent contamination raises morbidity and costs. Safer, fabric‑integrated antimicrobials... Read more
Dried Platelet Biologic Reduces Hemorrhage After Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) triggers immediate intracranial bleeding and days-later cerebral edema that can rapidly worsen neurological injury. Effective drug options to curb these processes are limited,... Read more
Wearable Cardiac Monitor with Cellular Transmission Enhances Remote Arrhythmia Detection
Remote cardiac monitoring requires comfort, wearability, and adherence to gather electrocardiogram data for clinical review. Mailing devices back for data processing can delay review. Faster insights,... Read moreSurgical Techniques
view channel
Torqueable Microcatheters Enhance Navigation in Complex Coronary Lesions
Interventional cardiologists frequently encounter tortuous vessels and heavily calcified or fibrotic coronary lesions that complicate guidewire control and device delivery. Stable, predictable torque and... Read more
Transcatheter Venous Arterialization Improves Outcomes in No-Option Limb Ischemia Patients
Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is an advanced stage of peripheral artery disease in which plaque narrows leg arteries and severely restricts blood flow, leading to pain, nonhealing wounds, and... Read morePatient Care
view channel
Wearable Sleep Data Predict Adherence to Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a long-term lung disorder that makes breathing difficult and often disturbs sleep, reducing energy for daily activities. Limited engagement in pulmonary... Read more
Revolutionary Automatic IV-Line Flushing Device to Enhance Infusion Care
More than 80% of in-hospital patients receive intravenous (IV) therapy. Every dose of IV medicine delivered in a small volume (<250 mL) infusion bag should be followed by subsequent flushing to ensure... Read moreHealth IT
view channel
AI System Detects and Quantifies Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Viz.ai (San Francisco, CA, USA) announced a strategic commercialization collaboration with Johnson & Johnson (New Brunswick, NJ, USA) to expand access in the United States to the Viz Subdural solution... Read more
Continuous Monitoring Platform Detects Infection Risk Across Care Transitions
Patients leaving skilled nursing facilities often lose continuous physiologic monitoring, increasing the risk of undetected infection and delayed intervention. Nursing home residents are seven times more... Read more
Automated System Classifies and Tracks Cardiogenic Shock Across Hospital Settings
Cardiogenic shock remains a difficult, time-sensitive emergency, with delayed identification driving poor outcomes and persistently high mortality. Many cases go undocumented even at advanced stages, hindering... Read morePoint of Care
view channelBusiness
view channel
Johnson & Johnson Launches AI-Driven Cardiac Mapping System
Johnson & Johnson has introduced the CARTOSOUND SONATA Module for the CARTO System at the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) 2026 meeting in Chicago. The module uses artificial intelligence with the CARTO... Read more







