Heart Association Issues Statement on Understanding Radiation Risks Before Cardiac Imaging
|
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 16 Oct 2014 |

Image: The American Heart Association issued a statement that patients need to be informed on radiation risks before undergoing cardiac imaging (Photo courtesy of AHA - The American Heart Association).
People should understand why a heart-imaging test is needed before undergoing the procedure, including the benefits and risks involved, such as the potential long-term risk from radiation exposure, advises a new scientific statement.
The statement was published online, before print, on September 29, 2014, in the American Heart Association’s (AHA; Dallas, TX, USA) journal Circulation. “When medical imaging is being considered, patients should feel very comfortable asking how the test will help them and the possible risks, including radiation-related risks,” said Reza Fazel, MD, MSc, chair of the writing committee for the statement and an AHA volunteer currently serving on the Joint Cardiac Imaging Committee of the AHA’s Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology.
As technology has evolved, imaging modalities have become an increasingly important application in diagnosing and treating patients with heart disease. However, the rising use has resulted in higher radiation exposure during the last 20 years. Heart imaging now accounts for nearly 40% of the radiation exposure patients receive from medical tests, according to the statement.
“In general, the radiation-related risk of any imaging test to an individual patient is very small and, when the test is clinically appropriate, the benefits of the test typically far outweigh any potential risks,” said Dr. Fazel, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA).
Some questions that may help a patient understand the risks and benefits are: (1) how will this test help diagnose or treat my heart problem? (2) Will the results of this test change the recommended treatment? (3) Are there other techniques to get the information without using radiation? (4) How much radiation exposure may occur? (5) How could that affect my chance of developing cancer later in life? (6) Lastly, how does that risk compare to the risk from other common activities?
The most typically used heart and blood vessel imaging procedures using radiation are nuclear stress tests, cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopy (a real-time X-ray technology used to guide catheter and device placement during heart catheterization and tests for heart rhythm abnormalities). Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging do not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
The new statement also provides guidance for the training of professionals who order or administer cardiac imaging tests. Clinicians planning imaging tests should understand when each type of test is appropriate, the typical average radiation dose and the potential risks. In deciding the best imaging method to use, the clinician should also consider the test’s diagnostic accuracy, potential risks, cost, availability, and the patient’s convenience.
“Radiation-related risk is one of the factors that should be considered in the decision to use cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation, particularly in younger patients in whom the potential risk of radiation exposure is thought to be higher,” Dr. Fazel said.
Clinicians who perform cardiac imaging should understand current methods required to select the optimal dose of radiation—using enough to produce high-quality imaged, not significantly more than that. They should also know how to minimize radiation exposure to staff, according to the statement.
Related Links:
American Heart Association
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
The statement was published online, before print, on September 29, 2014, in the American Heart Association’s (AHA; Dallas, TX, USA) journal Circulation. “When medical imaging is being considered, patients should feel very comfortable asking how the test will help them and the possible risks, including radiation-related risks,” said Reza Fazel, MD, MSc, chair of the writing committee for the statement and an AHA volunteer currently serving on the Joint Cardiac Imaging Committee of the AHA’s Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology.
As technology has evolved, imaging modalities have become an increasingly important application in diagnosing and treating patients with heart disease. However, the rising use has resulted in higher radiation exposure during the last 20 years. Heart imaging now accounts for nearly 40% of the radiation exposure patients receive from medical tests, according to the statement.
“In general, the radiation-related risk of any imaging test to an individual patient is very small and, when the test is clinically appropriate, the benefits of the test typically far outweigh any potential risks,” said Dr. Fazel, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA).
Some questions that may help a patient understand the risks and benefits are: (1) how will this test help diagnose or treat my heart problem? (2) Will the results of this test change the recommended treatment? (3) Are there other techniques to get the information without using radiation? (4) How much radiation exposure may occur? (5) How could that affect my chance of developing cancer later in life? (6) Lastly, how does that risk compare to the risk from other common activities?
The most typically used heart and blood vessel imaging procedures using radiation are nuclear stress tests, cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopy (a real-time X-ray technology used to guide catheter and device placement during heart catheterization and tests for heart rhythm abnormalities). Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging do not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
The new statement also provides guidance for the training of professionals who order or administer cardiac imaging tests. Clinicians planning imaging tests should understand when each type of test is appropriate, the typical average radiation dose and the potential risks. In deciding the best imaging method to use, the clinician should also consider the test’s diagnostic accuracy, potential risks, cost, availability, and the patient’s convenience.
“Radiation-related risk is one of the factors that should be considered in the decision to use cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation, particularly in younger patients in whom the potential risk of radiation exposure is thought to be higher,” Dr. Fazel said.
Clinicians who perform cardiac imaging should understand current methods required to select the optimal dose of radiation—using enough to produce high-quality imaged, not significantly more than that. They should also know how to minimize radiation exposure to staff, according to the statement.
Related Links:
American Heart Association
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Latest Critical Care News
- Wearable Sweat Test Simplifies Cystic Fibrosis Diagnosis
- New Risk Calculator Identifies Heart Disease Earlier in Postpartum Women
- New Soft Optical Sensor Advances Heart and Brain Activity Mapping
- AI System Stabilizes Oxygen Levels More Reliably Than Standard Care
- Radiation-Free Cardiac Catheterization Improves Care for Children
- Simple Triage Protocol Reduces Emergency Department Length of Stay
- ECG-Based AI Detects Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure
- Stretchable Hydrogel Electrodes Maintain Stable Signals During Movement
- New AI Wearable System Supports 24-Hour Sleep and Metabolic Regulation
- Sweat-Sensing Fingertip Patch Continuously Tracks Parkinson’s Medication Levels
- Postoperative Treatment Windows Enable Targeted Glioblastoma Therapy
- New Medical Masks and Gowns Support Protection Across Care Settings
- FDA Clears Software for Objective Assessment of Cognitive Function
- Stretchable Antenna Enables Reliable Wearable ECG Monitoring During Motion
- FDA Clears Noninvasive Test for Elevated Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure
- FDA-Cleared Index Enables Pediatric-Specific Sedation Monitoring
Channels
Artificial Intelligence
view channelCollaborative AI System Improves Medical Diagnostic Accuracy
Hospitals face a persistent trade-off when deploying artificial intelligence for diagnosis. Broad “generalist” models handle many tasks but often lack disease-specific precision. Narrow “specialist” models... Read more
AI-Powered Brain-Body Interface Supports Movement and Sensation Recovery
Neurological injuries such as stroke and spinal cord trauma frequently leave patients with profound motor and sensory deficits that limit independence. Rehabilitation may restore some movement, but recovery... Read moreCritical Care
view channel
Wearable Sweat Test Simplifies Cystic Fibrosis Diagnosis
Cystic fibrosis is a genetic disease that disrupts digestion and breathing. Diagnosis depends on sweat chloride testing that is typically limited to accredited centers and specialized laboratories.... Read more
New Risk Calculator Identifies Heart Disease Earlier in Postpartum Women
Cardiovascular disease in women often goes unrecognized until midlife, and standard risk calculators were built for older populations. Complications during pregnancy are linked to later heart disease,... Read moreSurgical Techniques
view channel
New Implant Provides Sustained Localized Therapy for Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian cancer is often diagnosed at advanced stages because symptoms such as bloating, pain, and pelvic pressure are nonspecific. Standard care relies on surgery and systemic therapy, yet tools for targeted... Read more
Combined Phage and Microbiota Therapy May Reduce Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) are frequent relapses of urinary infections that persist despite standard therapy. They increase morbidity, expose patients to repeated antibiotic courses, and... Read morePatient Care
view channel
AI Avatar Doctor Improves Patient Understanding Before Radiotherapy
Radiation oncology consultations require patients to grasp complex concepts quickly, yet anxiety and information overload often undermine understanding and informed consent. Poor comprehension can also... Read more
Wearable Sleep Data Predict Adherence to Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a long-term lung disorder that makes breathing difficult and often disturbs sleep, reducing energy for daily activities. Limited engagement in pulmonary... Read moreHealth IT
view channel
Short Digital Training Program Improves Motor Function in Parkinson’s Disease
Parkinson's disease causes motor symptoms that interfere with movement and daily activities. Drug treatment is standard care, yet additional approaches are needed to target motor control.... Read moreNew Cloud Platform Streamlines Capsule Endoscopy Workflow and Reporting
Capsule endoscopy programs depend on coordinated acquisition, review, and reporting to support gastrointestinal services. Managing these activities across practices and health systems requires reliable... Read morePoint of Care
view channelRapid Onsite Testing Reduces Emergency Department Transfers in Long-Term Care
Respiratory infections in long-term care residents frequently trigger emergency department transfers that strain hospital capacity and expose frail patients to additional risks. Turnaround delays from... Read more
New Brain Ultrasound Platform Enables Bedside Postoperative Imaging
Transporting postoperative patients for CT or MRI can create operational burdens, delays, and disruptions in care. Bedside visualization may help reduce transport demands, lower radiation exposure, and... Read moreBusiness
view channel
AI Software Combines Nodule Detection and Diagnosis for Lung Cancer Screening
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality, and screening programs rely on computed tomography to identify disease earlier when curative treatment is more likely. High patient volumes and... Read more







