Heart Association Issues Statement on Understanding Radiation Risks Before Cardiac Imaging
|
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 16 Oct 2014 |

Image: The American Heart Association issued a statement that patients need to be informed on radiation risks before undergoing cardiac imaging (Photo courtesy of AHA - The American Heart Association).
People should understand why a heart-imaging test is needed before undergoing the procedure, including the benefits and risks involved, such as the potential long-term risk from radiation exposure, advises a new scientific statement.
The statement was published online, before print, on September 29, 2014, in the American Heart Association’s (AHA; Dallas, TX, USA) journal Circulation. “When medical imaging is being considered, patients should feel very comfortable asking how the test will help them and the possible risks, including radiation-related risks,” said Reza Fazel, MD, MSc, chair of the writing committee for the statement and an AHA volunteer currently serving on the Joint Cardiac Imaging Committee of the AHA’s Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology.
As technology has evolved, imaging modalities have become an increasingly important application in diagnosing and treating patients with heart disease. However, the rising use has resulted in higher radiation exposure during the last 20 years. Heart imaging now accounts for nearly 40% of the radiation exposure patients receive from medical tests, according to the statement.
“In general, the radiation-related risk of any imaging test to an individual patient is very small and, when the test is clinically appropriate, the benefits of the test typically far outweigh any potential risks,” said Dr. Fazel, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA).
Some questions that may help a patient understand the risks and benefits are: (1) how will this test help diagnose or treat my heart problem? (2) Will the results of this test change the recommended treatment? (3) Are there other techniques to get the information without using radiation? (4) How much radiation exposure may occur? (5) How could that affect my chance of developing cancer later in life? (6) Lastly, how does that risk compare to the risk from other common activities?
The most typically used heart and blood vessel imaging procedures using radiation are nuclear stress tests, cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopy (a real-time X-ray technology used to guide catheter and device placement during heart catheterization and tests for heart rhythm abnormalities). Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging do not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
The new statement also provides guidance for the training of professionals who order or administer cardiac imaging tests. Clinicians planning imaging tests should understand when each type of test is appropriate, the typical average radiation dose and the potential risks. In deciding the best imaging method to use, the clinician should also consider the test’s diagnostic accuracy, potential risks, cost, availability, and the patient’s convenience.
“Radiation-related risk is one of the factors that should be considered in the decision to use cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation, particularly in younger patients in whom the potential risk of radiation exposure is thought to be higher,” Dr. Fazel said.
Clinicians who perform cardiac imaging should understand current methods required to select the optimal dose of radiation—using enough to produce high-quality imaged, not significantly more than that. They should also know how to minimize radiation exposure to staff, according to the statement.
Related Links:
American Heart Association
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
The statement was published online, before print, on September 29, 2014, in the American Heart Association’s (AHA; Dallas, TX, USA) journal Circulation. “When medical imaging is being considered, patients should feel very comfortable asking how the test will help them and the possible risks, including radiation-related risks,” said Reza Fazel, MD, MSc, chair of the writing committee for the statement and an AHA volunteer currently serving on the Joint Cardiac Imaging Committee of the AHA’s Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology.
As technology has evolved, imaging modalities have become an increasingly important application in diagnosing and treating patients with heart disease. However, the rising use has resulted in higher radiation exposure during the last 20 years. Heart imaging now accounts for nearly 40% of the radiation exposure patients receive from medical tests, according to the statement.
“In general, the radiation-related risk of any imaging test to an individual patient is very small and, when the test is clinically appropriate, the benefits of the test typically far outweigh any potential risks,” said Dr. Fazel, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA).
Some questions that may help a patient understand the risks and benefits are: (1) how will this test help diagnose or treat my heart problem? (2) Will the results of this test change the recommended treatment? (3) Are there other techniques to get the information without using radiation? (4) How much radiation exposure may occur? (5) How could that affect my chance of developing cancer later in life? (6) Lastly, how does that risk compare to the risk from other common activities?
The most typically used heart and blood vessel imaging procedures using radiation are nuclear stress tests, cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopy (a real-time X-ray technology used to guide catheter and device placement during heart catheterization and tests for heart rhythm abnormalities). Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging do not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
The new statement also provides guidance for the training of professionals who order or administer cardiac imaging tests. Clinicians planning imaging tests should understand when each type of test is appropriate, the typical average radiation dose and the potential risks. In deciding the best imaging method to use, the clinician should also consider the test’s diagnostic accuracy, potential risks, cost, availability, and the patient’s convenience.
“Radiation-related risk is one of the factors that should be considered in the decision to use cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation, particularly in younger patients in whom the potential risk of radiation exposure is thought to be higher,” Dr. Fazel said.
Clinicians who perform cardiac imaging should understand current methods required to select the optimal dose of radiation—using enough to produce high-quality imaged, not significantly more than that. They should also know how to minimize radiation exposure to staff, according to the statement.
Related Links:
American Heart Association
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Latest Critical Care News
- Octopus-Inspired Patch Improves Adhesion for Transdermal Drug Delivery
- Multimodal AI System Tracks Early Warning Signs of Mental Health Crisis
- Self-Folding Paper Sensor Conforms to Body Without Straps or Adhesives
- Patch-Based Therapy Promotes Myelin Repair in Multiple Sclerosis
- Rapid EHR Surveillance Helps Protect High-Risk Patients During Heat Waves
- Remote Cardiac Device Monitoring System Shows Safety and Cost Benefits
- Ambulatory ECG Monitor Improves Arrhythmia Detection in Syncope
- New Prediction Tool Supports Confident Prescribing of Heart Failure Medicines
- Machine Learning Models Identify Higher-Risk Pregnancies Earlier in Care
- Wearable Hormone Monitor Enables At-Home Detection of Primary Aldosteronism
- Contactless AI Tool Detects Hypertension and Diabetes from Facial Video
- AI Tool Predicts Bladder Cancer from Electronic Health Records
- Personalized Neuromodulation System Receives FDA Clearance for PTSD Treatment
- New Multimodal Framework Targets Debilitating Form of Heart Failure
- Telehealth-Enabled Paramedic Program Supports Post-Discharge Heart Failure Care
- AI Software Update Boosts Image Quality and Workflow for Portable MRI System
Channels
Artificial Intelligence
view channel
AI Tools Show Potential to Detect Subtle Signs of Interval Breast Cancer
Interval breast cancers, diagnosed after a negative screening mammogram and before the next scheduled exam, remain an important measure of screening performance and are often more aggressive.... Read more
AI Framework Aims to Turn Medical Care from Reactive to Preventive
Health systems face rising burdens from aging populations, chronic disease, and workforce shortages. Medical artificial intelligence (AI) remains concentrated in diagnosis and decision support, leaving... Read moreCritical Care
view channel
Octopus-Inspired Patch Improves Adhesion for Transdermal Drug Delivery
Transdermal drug delivery requires secure contact between a patch and dynamically moving skin. Everyday bending and stretching can open microgaps that degrade adhesion and reduce dose consistency, limiting... Read more
Multimodal AI System Tracks Early Warning Signs of Mental Health Crisis
In the United States, more than 47,000 people die by suicide each year and more than 10 million seriously consider it, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Yet clinicians often... Read moreSurgical Techniques
view channel
New Transvaginal Transducer Improves Imaging for Gynecology and Early Obstetrics
Transvaginal ultrasound is central to gynecology and early obstetrics, where clinicians must balance deep tissue penetration with high-resolution imaging. Switching probes to achieve this balance can interrupt... Read more
Mobile 3-in-1 Imaging System Advances Intraoperative Navigation
Globus Medical’s Excelsius3D intelligent 3-in-1 imaging system has received the CE Mark for commercial sale in the European Union and the United Kingdom. The addition of Excelsius3D expands the company’s... Read morePatient Care
view channel
Virtual Reality Helps Claustrophobic Patients Complete Cardiac PET/CT Scans
Anxiety and claustrophobia—intense fear of confined spaces—often prevent patients from completing cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Aborted scans delay diagnosis, consume... Read more
Weighted Blankets Reduce Anxiety in Hospitalized Adults
Anxiety is common among hospitalized adults and can impair recovery, disrupt sleep, and worsen mental health. Although clinicians often use nonpharmacologic strategies, bedside options that act quickly... Read moreHealth IT
view channel
Registry-Driven Digital Outreach Boosts Use of Heart Failure Medicines
Heart failure affects more than 64 million people worldwide and is linked to high mortality, reduced quality of life, and heavy healthcare use. Although sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors are proven... Read more
Nurse-Coordinated Care Model Improves Heart Failure Outcomes
Heart failure imposes heavy mortality, morbidity, and cost burdens worldwide, yet proven therapies remain underused in routine practice. This inadequate uptake contributes to preventable hospitalizations... Read morePoint of Care
view channel
Microneedle Patch Enables At-Home Monitoring of Acute Kidney Injury
Kidney disease is often silent in its early stages, making timely detection difficult outside clinical settings. Early biomarkers such as neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin can require blood draws... Read more
Ultrathin Metasurface Could Bring Quantitative Phase Imaging to Portable Devices
Point-of-care imaging often depends on bulky optical systems that have difficulty visualizing nearly transparent cells and tissues without staining. These limitations can slow diagnosis and restrict use... Read moreBusiness
view channel
Smartphone-Integrated Epinephrine Auto-Injector Concept Wins Red Dot Design Award
Severe allergic reactions can escalate rapidly and require prompt epinephrine, yet many at-risk patients do not consistently carry their auto-injector. With food allergies affecting an estimated 220 million... Read more







