Heart Association Issues Statement on Understanding Radiation Risks Before Cardiac Imaging
|
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 16 Oct 2014 |

Image: The American Heart Association issued a statement that patients need to be informed on radiation risks before undergoing cardiac imaging (Photo courtesy of AHA - The American Heart Association).
People should understand why a heart-imaging test is needed before undergoing the procedure, including the benefits and risks involved, such as the potential long-term risk from radiation exposure, advises a new scientific statement.
The statement was published online, before print, on September 29, 2014, in the American Heart Association’s (AHA; Dallas, TX, USA) journal Circulation. “When medical imaging is being considered, patients should feel very comfortable asking how the test will help them and the possible risks, including radiation-related risks,” said Reza Fazel, MD, MSc, chair of the writing committee for the statement and an AHA volunteer currently serving on the Joint Cardiac Imaging Committee of the AHA’s Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology.
As technology has evolved, imaging modalities have become an increasingly important application in diagnosing and treating patients with heart disease. However, the rising use has resulted in higher radiation exposure during the last 20 years. Heart imaging now accounts for nearly 40% of the radiation exposure patients receive from medical tests, according to the statement.
“In general, the radiation-related risk of any imaging test to an individual patient is very small and, when the test is clinically appropriate, the benefits of the test typically far outweigh any potential risks,” said Dr. Fazel, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA).
Some questions that may help a patient understand the risks and benefits are: (1) how will this test help diagnose or treat my heart problem? (2) Will the results of this test change the recommended treatment? (3) Are there other techniques to get the information without using radiation? (4) How much radiation exposure may occur? (5) How could that affect my chance of developing cancer later in life? (6) Lastly, how does that risk compare to the risk from other common activities?
The most typically used heart and blood vessel imaging procedures using radiation are nuclear stress tests, cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopy (a real-time X-ray technology used to guide catheter and device placement during heart catheterization and tests for heart rhythm abnormalities). Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging do not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
The new statement also provides guidance for the training of professionals who order or administer cardiac imaging tests. Clinicians planning imaging tests should understand when each type of test is appropriate, the typical average radiation dose and the potential risks. In deciding the best imaging method to use, the clinician should also consider the test’s diagnostic accuracy, potential risks, cost, availability, and the patient’s convenience.
“Radiation-related risk is one of the factors that should be considered in the decision to use cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation, particularly in younger patients in whom the potential risk of radiation exposure is thought to be higher,” Dr. Fazel said.
Clinicians who perform cardiac imaging should understand current methods required to select the optimal dose of radiation—using enough to produce high-quality imaged, not significantly more than that. They should also know how to minimize radiation exposure to staff, according to the statement.
Related Links:
American Heart Association
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
The statement was published online, before print, on September 29, 2014, in the American Heart Association’s (AHA; Dallas, TX, USA) journal Circulation. “When medical imaging is being considered, patients should feel very comfortable asking how the test will help them and the possible risks, including radiation-related risks,” said Reza Fazel, MD, MSc, chair of the writing committee for the statement and an AHA volunteer currently serving on the Joint Cardiac Imaging Committee of the AHA’s Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology.
As technology has evolved, imaging modalities have become an increasingly important application in diagnosing and treating patients with heart disease. However, the rising use has resulted in higher radiation exposure during the last 20 years. Heart imaging now accounts for nearly 40% of the radiation exposure patients receive from medical tests, according to the statement.
“In general, the radiation-related risk of any imaging test to an individual patient is very small and, when the test is clinically appropriate, the benefits of the test typically far outweigh any potential risks,” said Dr. Fazel, a cardiologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA).
Some questions that may help a patient understand the risks and benefits are: (1) how will this test help diagnose or treat my heart problem? (2) Will the results of this test change the recommended treatment? (3) Are there other techniques to get the information without using radiation? (4) How much radiation exposure may occur? (5) How could that affect my chance of developing cancer later in life? (6) Lastly, how does that risk compare to the risk from other common activities?
The most typically used heart and blood vessel imaging procedures using radiation are nuclear stress tests, cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans and fluoroscopy (a real-time X-ray technology used to guide catheter and device placement during heart catheterization and tests for heart rhythm abnormalities). Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging do not expose patients to ionizing radiation.
The new statement also provides guidance for the training of professionals who order or administer cardiac imaging tests. Clinicians planning imaging tests should understand when each type of test is appropriate, the typical average radiation dose and the potential risks. In deciding the best imaging method to use, the clinician should also consider the test’s diagnostic accuracy, potential risks, cost, availability, and the patient’s convenience.
“Radiation-related risk is one of the factors that should be considered in the decision to use cardiovascular imaging with ionizing radiation, particularly in younger patients in whom the potential risk of radiation exposure is thought to be higher,” Dr. Fazel said.
Clinicians who perform cardiac imaging should understand current methods required to select the optimal dose of radiation—using enough to produce high-quality imaged, not significantly more than that. They should also know how to minimize radiation exposure to staff, according to the statement.
Related Links:
American Heart Association
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Latest Critical Care News
- Patch-Based Therapy Promotes Myelin Repair in Multiple Sclerosis
- Rapid EHR Surveillance Helps Protect High-Risk Patients During Heat Waves
- Remote Cardiac Device Monitoring System Shows Safety and Cost Benefits
- Ambulatory ECG Monitor Improves Arrhythmia Detection in Syncope
- New Prediction Tool Supports Confident Prescribing of Heart Failure Medicines
- Machine Learning Models Identify Higher-Risk Pregnancies Earlier in Care
- Wearable Hormone Monitor Enables At-Home Detection of Primary Aldosteronism
- Contactless AI Tool Detects Hypertension and Diabetes from Facial Video
- AI Tool Predicts Bladder Cancer from Electronic Health Records
- Personalized Neuromodulation System Receives FDA Clearance for PTSD Treatment
- New Multimodal Framework Targets Debilitating Form of Heart Failure
- Telehealth-Enabled Paramedic Program Supports Post-Discharge Heart Failure Care
- AI Software Update Boosts Image Quality and Workflow for Portable MRI System
- New Polymer Electrode Extends Runtime of Needle-Free Drug Delivery Patches
- Ultrasound Technique Enables Arrhythmia Risk Assessment in Mitral Valve Disease
- 3D-Printed Membrane Could Enable Smaller, More Efficient Artificial Lungs
Channels
Artificial Intelligence
view channel
AI Framework Aims to Turn Medical Care from Reactive to Preventive
Health systems face rising burdens from aging populations, chronic disease, and workforce shortages. Medical artificial intelligence (AI) remains concentrated in diagnosis and decision support, leaving... Read more
AI Model Predicts Indwelling Catheter Use After Spinal Cord Injury
Patients with early-stage spinal cord injury and neurogenic bladder often face uncertain trajectories in urinary catheter management. Clinicians need tools to anticipate conversion to indwelling catheters... Read moreCritical Care
view channel
Patch-Based Therapy Promotes Myelin Repair in Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease that damages the myelin sheath in the central nervous system, leading to progressive disability. After inflammatory attacks, remyelination is often... Read more
Remote Cardiac Device Monitoring System Shows Safety and Cost Benefits
Regular in-clinic follow-up for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, including pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators, is resource intensive. As device use rises with aging... Read moreSurgical Techniques
view channel
Nanobone Material Activates Natural Repair Signals to Regrow Bone
Cleft lip and palate is a birth defect that affects about 1 in 700 children and occurs when parts of the upper lip or roof of the mouth do not fully fuse during pregnancy. Repairing the resulting jawbone... Read more
First Robotic Dual Liver-Kidney Transplant Expands Minimally Invasive Transplant Surgery
Patients with end-stage liver disease often develop renal failure, creating the need for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation. Traditional open dual-organ transplantation requires large incisions... Read morePatient Care
view channel
Weighted Blankets Reduce Anxiety in Hospitalized Adults
Anxiety is common among hospitalized adults and can impair recovery, disrupt sleep, and worsen mental health. Although clinicians often use nonpharmacologic strategies, bedside options that act quickly... Read more
Multicenter Study Quantifies Delays in Care for Emergency Department Boarders
Emergency department (ED) boarding—the practice of keeping admitted patients in the ED while awaiting an inpatient bed—creates hazardous delays in definitive care. Prolonged transitions expose older and... Read moreHealth IT
view channel
Nurse-Coordinated Care Model Improves Heart Failure Outcomes
Heart failure imposes heavy mortality, morbidity, and cost burdens worldwide, yet proven therapies remain underused in routine practice. This inadequate uptake contributes to preventable hospitalizations... Read more
Imaging Tool Quantifies Calcinosis Cutis Volume to Monitor Treatment
Calcinosis cutis involves calcium deposits in the skin or soft tissues that can develop anywhere in the body, causing pain, impaired mobility, and disability. Lesions along the spine or buttocks can make... Read morePoint of Care
view channel
Microneedle Patch Enables At-Home Monitoring of Acute Kidney Injury
Kidney disease is often silent in its early stages, making timely detection difficult outside clinical settings. Early biomarkers such as neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin can require blood draws... Read more
Ultrathin Metasurface Could Bring Quantitative Phase Imaging to Portable Devices
Point-of-care imaging often depends on bulky optical systems that have difficulty visualizing nearly transparent cells and tissues without staining. These limitations can slow diagnosis and restrict use... Read moreBusiness
view channel
Smartphone-Integrated Epinephrine Auto-Injector Concept Wins Red Dot Design Award
Severe allergic reactions can escalate rapidly and require prompt epinephrine, yet many at-risk patients do not consistently carry their auto-injector. With food allergies affecting an estimated 220 million... Read more







