Low Compliance Rates Hinder PC Active Surveillance
|
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 17 Jun 2019 |
Only one in six men who choose active surveillance (AS) instead of immediate treatment for early stage prostate cancer (PC) actually undergo monitoring, claims a new study.
Researchers at the University of North Carolina (UNC, Chapel Hill, USA) conducted a population-based cohort study involving 346 men with newly diagnosed low- or intermediate-risk PC between 2011 and 2013 who pursued AS. Medical records and patient-reported outcomes, including prostate cancer anxiety (PCA) and prostate cancer decision regret (PCDR), were collected prospectively. Adherence monitoring was assessed per contemporary guidelines, which recommend prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing every 3–6 months and prostate biopsy within 18 months of initial diagnosis.
The results revealed that 58% of patients received adequate PSA testing and 45% underwent prostate biopsy; overall, 32% of patients received guideline-adherent monitoring. Urology follow-up during the first year was 97%, but dropped to 67% in year two. In addition, the researchers found that within the first two years, 16% of patients converted to treatment, dropping the AS group to just 15% of the cohort. PCA scores and younger age were significantly associated with conversion, and 94% expressed no regret. The study was presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting, held during June 2019 in Chicago (IL, USA).
“What we thought upfront was that adherence to monitoring would not be perfect, but what we found was that adherence to monitoring was only about 15%. If that's the case, it raises the question as to whether AS is a good option for patients and whether it's safe,” said senior author Ronald Chen, MD, MPH. “I want to emphasize our message with this study is not to discourage AS, as we recognize that patients with low-risk prostate cancer are being over-treated. If we are going to offer it, we must make sure that patients are reminded about their appointments, that someone is tracking the fact that they are getting the monitoring they need.”
Current standard of care for men with low-risk prostate cancer is AS, which involves monitoring of PSA levels, digital rectal exams, or prostate biopsies. As radical therapy, which involves surgically removing or irradiating the whole prostate, has significant long-term side effects, including erectile dysfunction and incontinence, it is only used to treat high-risk cancers.
Related Links:
University of North Carolina
Researchers at the University of North Carolina (UNC, Chapel Hill, USA) conducted a population-based cohort study involving 346 men with newly diagnosed low- or intermediate-risk PC between 2011 and 2013 who pursued AS. Medical records and patient-reported outcomes, including prostate cancer anxiety (PCA) and prostate cancer decision regret (PCDR), were collected prospectively. Adherence monitoring was assessed per contemporary guidelines, which recommend prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing every 3–6 months and prostate biopsy within 18 months of initial diagnosis.
The results revealed that 58% of patients received adequate PSA testing and 45% underwent prostate biopsy; overall, 32% of patients received guideline-adherent monitoring. Urology follow-up during the first year was 97%, but dropped to 67% in year two. In addition, the researchers found that within the first two years, 16% of patients converted to treatment, dropping the AS group to just 15% of the cohort. PCA scores and younger age were significantly associated with conversion, and 94% expressed no regret. The study was presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting, held during June 2019 in Chicago (IL, USA).
“What we thought upfront was that adherence to monitoring would not be perfect, but what we found was that adherence to monitoring was only about 15%. If that's the case, it raises the question as to whether AS is a good option for patients and whether it's safe,” said senior author Ronald Chen, MD, MPH. “I want to emphasize our message with this study is not to discourage AS, as we recognize that patients with low-risk prostate cancer are being over-treated. If we are going to offer it, we must make sure that patients are reminded about their appointments, that someone is tracking the fact that they are getting the monitoring they need.”
Current standard of care for men with low-risk prostate cancer is AS, which involves monitoring of PSA levels, digital rectal exams, or prostate biopsies. As radical therapy, which involves surgically removing or irradiating the whole prostate, has significant long-term side effects, including erectile dysfunction and incontinence, it is only used to treat high-risk cancers.
Related Links:
University of North Carolina
Latest Critical Care News
- Noninvasive Monitoring Device Enables Earlier Intervention in Heart Failure
- Automated IV Labeling Solution Improves Infusion Safety and Efficiency
- First-Of-Its-Kind AI Tool Detects Pulmonary Hypertension from Standard ECGs
- 4D Digital Twin Heart Model Improves CRT Outcomes
- AI Turns Glucose Data Into Actionable Insights for Diabetes Care
- Microscale Wireless Implant Tracks Brain Activity Over Time
- Smart Mask Delivers Continuous, Battery-Free Breath Monitoring
- Routine Blood Pressure Readings May Identify Risk of Future Cognitive Decline
- CGM-Based Algorithm Enhances Insulin Dose Adjustment in Type 2 Diabetes
- Fish Scale–Based Implants Offer New Approach to Corneal Repair
- Dual-Function Wound Patch Combines Infection Sensing and Treatment
- Smartwatch Signals and Blood Tests Team Up for Early Warning on Insulin Resistance
- Smart Fabric Technology Aims to Prevent Pressure Injuries in Hospital Care
- Standardized Treatment Algorithm Improves Blood Pressure Control
- Combined Infection Control Strategy Limits Drug-Resistant Outbreak in NICU
- AI Helps Predict Which Heart-Failure Patients Will Worsen Within a Year
Channels
Artificial Intelligence
view channelAI Analysis of Pericardial Fat Refines Long-Term Heart Disease Risk
Accurately identifying long-term cardiovascular disease risk in asymptomatic adults remains challenging for clinicians. Missed or underestimated risk delays preventive therapy and increases the chance... Read more
Machine Learning Approach Enhances Liver Cancer Risk Stratification
Hepatocellular carcinoma, the most common form of primary liver cancer, is often detected late despite targeted surveillance programs. Current screening guidelines emphasize patients with known cirrhosis,... Read moreSurgical Techniques
view channel
Ultrasound Technology Aims to Replace Invasive BPH Procedures
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a frequent cause of lower urinary tract symptoms in aging men and often requires invasive procedures or prolonged recovery. With prevalence expected to rise as populations... Read more
Continuous Monitoring with Wearables Enhances Postoperative Patient Safety
Postoperative hypoxemia on general surgical wards is common and often missed by intermittent vital sign checks. Undetected low oxygen levels can delay recovery and raise the risk of complications that... Read morePatient Care
view channel
Wearable Sleep Data Predict Adherence to Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a long-term lung disorder that makes breathing difficult and often disturbs sleep, reducing energy for daily activities. Limited engagement in pulmonary... Read more
Revolutionary Automatic IV-Line Flushing Device to Enhance Infusion Care
More than 80% of in-hospital patients receive intravenous (IV) therapy. Every dose of IV medicine delivered in a small volume (<250 mL) infusion bag should be followed by subsequent flushing to ensure... Read moreHealth IT
view channel
EMR-Based Tool Predicts Graft Failure After Kidney Transplant
Kidney transplantation offers patients with end-stage kidney disease longer survival and better quality of life than dialysis, yet graft failure remains a major challenge. Although a successful transplant... Read more
Printable Molecule-Selective Nanoparticles Enable Mass Production of Wearable Biosensors
The future of medicine is likely to focus on the personalization of healthcare—understanding exactly what an individual requires and delivering the appropriate combination of nutrients, metabolites, and... Read moreBusiness
view channel







