We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

HospiMedica

Download Mobile App
Recent News AI Critical Care Surgical Techniques Patient Care Health IT Point of Care Business Focus

Circumventing Sedation Reduces Mechanical Ventilation Time

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 05 Feb 2010
A new study shows that avoiding sedation in ventilated patients shortens the duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and hospitalization time.

Researchers at Odense University Hospital (Denmark) randomized 140 mechanically ventilated patients to either an interrupted sedation group--with the sedative infusion stopped every morning and the patient awakened--or to a no-sedation group. All patients received intravenous (IV) morphine boluses as needed and IV haloperidol for delirium, but no physical restraints were used. If possible, the patients were sat in a chair each day. Excluding those patients who died or were extubated within less than 48 hours of ventilation, 55 patients in the no-sedation group and 58 in the sedation group remained for intent-to-treat analysis.

The results showed that after 4 weeks, the sedation group had significantly more days on mechanical ventilation the no-sedation group ((13.8 versus 9.6 days, respectively). In addition, the sedated patients averaged more days in the ICU (22.8 versus 13.1 days) and longer overall hospital stays (58 versus 34 days); however, once patients were in the ICU for longer than 30 days, sedation no longer affected total ICU length of stay. The researchers observed no significant differences between groups in accidental removal of the endotracheal tube, need for brain imaging, or incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Overall, 18% of patients in the no-sedation group could not tolerate it and had to receive continuous sedation on more than two occasions, typically to permit sufficient oxygenation in a severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) episode. The only negative impact of the no-sedation strategy appeared to be an increase in agitated delirium (20% versus 7%) resulting in more frequent use of haloperidol. The study was published in the February 6, 2010, issue of the Lancet.

"I think most importantly one needs to evaluate the patients' needs each day; make sure they are comfortable and free of pain and only give sedation as a last escape,” said lead author Thomas Strøm, M.D., of the department of anesthesia and intensive care medicine.

Related Links:

Odense University Hospital



Gold Member
12-Channel ECG
CM1200B
Gold Member
SARS‑CoV‑2/Flu A/Flu B/RSV Sample-To-Answer Test
SARS‑CoV‑2/Flu A/Flu B/RSV Cartridge (CE-IVD)
X-Ray Generator
Advantage Plus Generators
POC Respiratory/Sore Throat Test
BIOFIRE SPOTFIRE (R/ST) Panel

Channels

Artificial Intelligence

view channel
Image: Coredio’s CPSE is a a software-as-a-medical-device platform designed for use with consumer smartwatches and standard blood pressure cuffs in clinical and home settings under physician supervision (Photo courtesy of Coredio)

AI Platform Supports Noninvasive Remote Hemodynamic Monitoring in Heart Failure

Heart failure remains a leading cause of hospitalization in adults over 65, affecting more than 6.7 million people in the U.S. Clinicians often lose visibility into hemodynamic deterioration once patients... Read more