Robotic Hysterectomy Shows Little Benefit
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 05 Mar 2013 |
Rapid growth of robotic hysterectomy procedure volume continues despite a lack of data to support any advantages over conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy, claims a new study.
Researchers at Columbia University (New York, NY, USA) conducted a cohort study of 264,758 women who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disorders at 441 hospitals across the United States from 2007 to 2010. The researchers analyzed uptake of robotically assisted hysterectomy to determine the association between use of robotic surgery and rates of abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy, and to compare the in-house complications of both procedures. The main outcome measures were uptake of and factors associated with utilization of robotically assisted hysterectomy.
The results showed that the use of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.5% in 2007 to 9.5% of all hysterectomies in 2010; during the same time period, laparoscopic hysterectomy rates increased from 24.3% to 30.5%. The overall complication rates were similar for robotic-assisted and laparoscopic hysterectomy (5.5% versus 5.3%). Robotic-assisted hysterectomy patients were less likely to have a length of stay longer than two days, but transfusion requirements and the rate of discharge to a nursing facility were similar. Total costs associated with robotically assisted hysterectomy were USD 2,189 higher per case than for laparoscopic hysterectomy. The study was published in the February 20, 2012, issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
“The uptake of laparoscopic hysterectomy has occurred slowly, given that the technique has been available since the 1990s. By comparison, uptake of robotic hysterectomy has been rapid,” said lead author Jason Wright, MD. “Our study indicates that, while robotic assistance was associated with increased use of minimally invasive surgery for hysterectomy, when compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy, the robotic procedure offers little short-term benefit and is accompanied by significantly higher costs.”
Robotically assisted surgery has several potential benefits that have driven interest in and use of the technology since the FDA approved the surgical platform in 2005. Among the possible benefits are a wider range of motion with instrumentation and three-dimensional (3D) stereoscopic visualization, and the fact that users can work from an ergonomically friendly console. Proponents of robotic hysterectomy have asserted that the approach extends minimally invasive surgery to women who otherwise would undergo laparotomy, but offer little supporting evidence to that claim.
Related Links:
Columbia University
Researchers at Columbia University (New York, NY, USA) conducted a cohort study of 264,758 women who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disorders at 441 hospitals across the United States from 2007 to 2010. The researchers analyzed uptake of robotically assisted hysterectomy to determine the association between use of robotic surgery and rates of abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy, and to compare the in-house complications of both procedures. The main outcome measures were uptake of and factors associated with utilization of robotically assisted hysterectomy.
The results showed that the use of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.5% in 2007 to 9.5% of all hysterectomies in 2010; during the same time period, laparoscopic hysterectomy rates increased from 24.3% to 30.5%. The overall complication rates were similar for robotic-assisted and laparoscopic hysterectomy (5.5% versus 5.3%). Robotic-assisted hysterectomy patients were less likely to have a length of stay longer than two days, but transfusion requirements and the rate of discharge to a nursing facility were similar. Total costs associated with robotically assisted hysterectomy were USD 2,189 higher per case than for laparoscopic hysterectomy. The study was published in the February 20, 2012, issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
“The uptake of laparoscopic hysterectomy has occurred slowly, given that the technique has been available since the 1990s. By comparison, uptake of robotic hysterectomy has been rapid,” said lead author Jason Wright, MD. “Our study indicates that, while robotic assistance was associated with increased use of minimally invasive surgery for hysterectomy, when compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy, the robotic procedure offers little short-term benefit and is accompanied by significantly higher costs.”
Robotically assisted surgery has several potential benefits that have driven interest in and use of the technology since the FDA approved the surgical platform in 2005. Among the possible benefits are a wider range of motion with instrumentation and three-dimensional (3D) stereoscopic visualization, and the fact that users can work from an ergonomically friendly console. Proponents of robotic hysterectomy have asserted that the approach extends minimally invasive surgery to women who otherwise would undergo laparotomy, but offer little supporting evidence to that claim.
Related Links:
Columbia University
Latest Surgical Techniques News
- Miniaturized Ultrasonic Scalpel Enables Faster and Safer Robotic-Assisted Surgery
- AI Assisted Reading Tool for Small Bowel Video Capsule Endoscopy Detects More Lesions
- First-Ever Contact Force Pulsed Field Ablation System to Transform Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias
- Caterpillar Robot with Built-In Steering System Crawls Easily Through Loops and Bends
- Tiny Wraparound Electronic Implants to Revolutionize Treatment of Spinal Cord Injuries
- Small, Implantable Cardiac Pump to Help Children Awaiting Heart Transplant
- Gastrointestinal Imaging Capsule a Game-Changer in Esophagus Surveillance and Treatment
- World’s Smallest Laser Probe for Brain Procedures Facilitates Ablation of Full Range of Targets
- Artificial Intelligence Broadens Diagnostic Abilities of Conventional Coronary Angiography
- AI-Powered Surgical Visualization Tool Supports Surgeons' Visual Recognition in Real Time
- Cutting-Edge Robotic Bronchial Endoscopic System Provides Prompt Intervention during Emergencies
- Handheld Device for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery a Game Changer for Removal of High-Grade Glioma Brain Tumors
- Porous Gel Sponge Facilitates Rapid Hemostasis and Wound Healing
- Novel Rigid Endoscope System Enables Deep Tissue Imaging During Surgery
- Robotic Nerve ‘Cuffs’ Could Treat Various Neurological Conditions
- Flexible Microdisplay Visualizes Brain Activity in Real-Time To Guide Neurosurgeons