Restricting Transfusions After Cardiac Surgery Shows No Benefit
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 25 Mar 2015 |
A new study concludes that there is no health advantage if doctors wait until a heart surgery patient becomes substantially anemic before receiving a transfusion.
Researchers at the University of Leicester (United Kingdom), Bristol Royal Infirmary (BRI; United Kingdom), and other institutions conducted a multicenter, parallel-group trial involving 2,007 patients who were undergoing non-emergency cardiac surgery at 17 centers across the United Kingdom.
Patients with a postoperative hemoglobin level of less than 9 g/dL were randomly assigned to a restrictive transfusion threshold (hemoglobin level lower 7.5 g/dL or a liberal transfusion threshold (hemoglobin level lower than 9 g/dL).
Primary outcomes were a serious infection (sepsis or wound infection) or an ischemic event within three months of randomization. Health care costs, excluding the index surgery, were estimated from the day of surgery to three months after surgery. The results showed that transfusion rates were 53.4% and 92.2% in the two groups, respectively. Primary outcome occurred in 35.1% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group and 33% of the patients in the liberal-threshold group.
There were more deaths in the restrictive-threshold group (4.2%) than in the liberal-threshold group (2.6%). Serious postoperative complications, excluding primary-outcome events, occurred in 35.7% of participants in the restrictive-threshold group and 34.2% of participants in the liberal-threshold group. The researchers also found that total costs did not differ significantly between the groups. The study was published on March 13, 2015, in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).
“With an aging population and possibly an increase in heart disease, obesity and diabetes, it can only become more difficult in the future to maintain the national blood supply in the UK and in other developed countries around the world,” said corresponding author Barnaby Reeves, MD, of Bristol Royal Infirmary. “Our findings emphasize the importance of interventions to reduce blood loss in the first place.”
“Existing national and international transfusion guidelines recommend that blood transfusions only be given to patients who develop very low hemoglobin concentrations. We have shown that this strategy may increase the number of deaths in cardiac surgery,” said lead author, Professor of cardiac surgery Gavin Murphy, MD, of the University of Leicester.
In the United Kingdom, about half of all patients having cardiac surgery are given a RBC transfusion after the operation, depleting up to 10% of the nation’s blood bank. Since the patients who receive blood transfusions are also believed to have more complications (such as infections, heart attacks and strokes), researchers have speculated that a restrictive transfusion policy could improve clinical outcomes and help maintain an adequate blood supply.
Related Links:
University of Leicester
Bristol Royal Infirmary
Researchers at the University of Leicester (United Kingdom), Bristol Royal Infirmary (BRI; United Kingdom), and other institutions conducted a multicenter, parallel-group trial involving 2,007 patients who were undergoing non-emergency cardiac surgery at 17 centers across the United Kingdom.
Patients with a postoperative hemoglobin level of less than 9 g/dL were randomly assigned to a restrictive transfusion threshold (hemoglobin level lower 7.5 g/dL or a liberal transfusion threshold (hemoglobin level lower than 9 g/dL).
Primary outcomes were a serious infection (sepsis or wound infection) or an ischemic event within three months of randomization. Health care costs, excluding the index surgery, were estimated from the day of surgery to three months after surgery. The results showed that transfusion rates were 53.4% and 92.2% in the two groups, respectively. Primary outcome occurred in 35.1% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group and 33% of the patients in the liberal-threshold group.
There were more deaths in the restrictive-threshold group (4.2%) than in the liberal-threshold group (2.6%). Serious postoperative complications, excluding primary-outcome events, occurred in 35.7% of participants in the restrictive-threshold group and 34.2% of participants in the liberal-threshold group. The researchers also found that total costs did not differ significantly between the groups. The study was published on March 13, 2015, in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).
“With an aging population and possibly an increase in heart disease, obesity and diabetes, it can only become more difficult in the future to maintain the national blood supply in the UK and in other developed countries around the world,” said corresponding author Barnaby Reeves, MD, of Bristol Royal Infirmary. “Our findings emphasize the importance of interventions to reduce blood loss in the first place.”
“Existing national and international transfusion guidelines recommend that blood transfusions only be given to patients who develop very low hemoglobin concentrations. We have shown that this strategy may increase the number of deaths in cardiac surgery,” said lead author, Professor of cardiac surgery Gavin Murphy, MD, of the University of Leicester.
In the United Kingdom, about half of all patients having cardiac surgery are given a RBC transfusion after the operation, depleting up to 10% of the nation’s blood bank. Since the patients who receive blood transfusions are also believed to have more complications (such as infections, heart attacks and strokes), researchers have speculated that a restrictive transfusion policy could improve clinical outcomes and help maintain an adequate blood supply.
Related Links:
University of Leicester
Bristol Royal Infirmary
Latest Surgical Techniques News
- Miniaturized Snake-Like Probe Images Cerebral Arteries From Within
- Miniaturized Implantable Multi-Sensors Device to Monitor Vessels Health
- Tiny Robots Made Out Of Carbon Could Conduct Colonoscopy, Pelvic Exam or Blood Test
- Miniaturized Ultrasonic Scalpel Enables Faster and Safer Robotic-Assisted Surgery
- AI Assisted Reading Tool for Small Bowel Video Capsule Endoscopy Detects More Lesions
- First-Ever Contact Force Pulsed Field Ablation System to Transform Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias
- Caterpillar Robot with Built-In Steering System Crawls Easily Through Loops and Bends
- Tiny Wraparound Electronic Implants to Revolutionize Treatment of Spinal Cord Injuries
- Small, Implantable Cardiac Pump to Help Children Awaiting Heart Transplant
- Gastrointestinal Imaging Capsule a Game-Changer in Esophagus Surveillance and Treatment
- World’s Smallest Laser Probe for Brain Procedures Facilitates Ablation of Full Range of Targets
- Artificial Intelligence Broadens Diagnostic Abilities of Conventional Coronary Angiography
- AI-Powered Surgical Visualization Tool Supports Surgeons' Visual Recognition in Real Time
- Cutting-Edge Robotic Bronchial Endoscopic System Provides Prompt Intervention during Emergencies
- Handheld Device for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery a Game Changer for Removal of High-Grade Glioma Brain Tumors
- Porous Gel Sponge Facilitates Rapid Hemostasis and Wound Healing