Low Birthweight May Lead to Type 2 Diabetes
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 06 Jul 2016 |
A new study finds an association between low birthweight babies and type 2 diabetes mellitus (2DM) in adulthood, but suggests the relationship might be causal.
Researchers at Tulane University (New Orleans, LA, USA) conducted a study that reviewed 3,627 individuals with 2DM and 12,974 controls (all of European ancestry) who participated in the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. A genetic risk score (GRS) was calculated, based on five low-birthweight-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The researchers then assessed the evidence for causality, first by examining the association of the GRS and the individual SNPs with 2DM, and then by performing a Mendelian randomization analysis to estimate the potentially causal effect size of low birthweight on 2DM.
The results showed that for every one point increase in genetic risk score for low birthweight, there was an associated 6% higher risk of 2DM. For every one standard deviation of lower birthweight, the Mendelian randomization odds ratio was 2.94, providing support for the hypothesis that there is a causal relationship between a lower birthweight and an increased risk for developing 2DM. The association was stronger among female participants. The study was published on June 23, 2016, in Diabetologia.
“Type 2 diabetes was determined based on self-reports, and covariates such as smoking cigarettes, drinking alcohol, and doing physical activity were all assessed,” said lead author Lu Qi, MD, PhD, and colleagues of the School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine. “While previous studies have suggested a link between intrauterine malnutrition and type 2 diabetes, this study is unique in that it suggests a link that is specifically causal. Due to covariates including socioeconomic and lifestyle factors, it can be difficult to prove that causality does indeed exist.”
In epidemiology, Mendelian randomization is a method of using measured variation in genes of known function to examine the causal effect of a modifiable exposure on disease in non-experimental studies. It uses common genetic polymorphisms with well-understood effects on exposure patterns, or effects that mimic those produced by modifiable exposures. The genotype must only affect the disease status indirectly via its effect on the exposure of interest. Mendelian randomization was first described as a method for obtaining unbiased estimates of the effects of a putative causal variable, without conducting a traditional randomized trial.
Related Links:
Tulane University
Researchers at Tulane University (New Orleans, LA, USA) conducted a study that reviewed 3,627 individuals with 2DM and 12,974 controls (all of European ancestry) who participated in the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. A genetic risk score (GRS) was calculated, based on five low-birthweight-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The researchers then assessed the evidence for causality, first by examining the association of the GRS and the individual SNPs with 2DM, and then by performing a Mendelian randomization analysis to estimate the potentially causal effect size of low birthweight on 2DM.
The results showed that for every one point increase in genetic risk score for low birthweight, there was an associated 6% higher risk of 2DM. For every one standard deviation of lower birthweight, the Mendelian randomization odds ratio was 2.94, providing support for the hypothesis that there is a causal relationship between a lower birthweight and an increased risk for developing 2DM. The association was stronger among female participants. The study was published on June 23, 2016, in Diabetologia.
“Type 2 diabetes was determined based on self-reports, and covariates such as smoking cigarettes, drinking alcohol, and doing physical activity were all assessed,” said lead author Lu Qi, MD, PhD, and colleagues of the School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine. “While previous studies have suggested a link between intrauterine malnutrition and type 2 diabetes, this study is unique in that it suggests a link that is specifically causal. Due to covariates including socioeconomic and lifestyle factors, it can be difficult to prove that causality does indeed exist.”
In epidemiology, Mendelian randomization is a method of using measured variation in genes of known function to examine the causal effect of a modifiable exposure on disease in non-experimental studies. It uses common genetic polymorphisms with well-understood effects on exposure patterns, or effects that mimic those produced by modifiable exposures. The genotype must only affect the disease status indirectly via its effect on the exposure of interest. Mendelian randomization was first described as a method for obtaining unbiased estimates of the effects of a putative causal variable, without conducting a traditional randomized trial.
Related Links:
Tulane University
Latest Critical Care News
- Powerful AI Risk Assessment Tool Predicts Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients
- Peptide-Based Hydrogels Repair Damaged Organs and Tissues On-The-Spot
- One-Hour Endoscopic Procedure Could Eliminate Need for Insulin for Type 2 Diabetes
- AI Can Prioritize Emergency Department Patients Requiring Urgent Treatment
- AI to Improve Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation
- Stretchable Microneedles to Help In Accurate Tracking of Abnormalities and Identifying Rapid Treatment
- Machine Learning Tool Identifies Rare, Undiagnosed Immune Disorders from Patient EHRs
- On-Skin Wearable Bioelectronic Device Paves Way for Intelligent Implants
- First-Of-Its-Kind Dissolvable Stent to Improve Outcomes for Patients with Severe PAD
- AI Brain-Age Estimation Technology Uses EEG Scans to Screen for Degenerative Diseases
- Wheeze-Counting Wearable Device Monitors Patient's Breathing In Real Time
- Wearable Multiplex Biosensors Could Revolutionize COPD Management
- New Low-Energy Defibrillation Method Controls Cardiac Arrhythmias
- New Machine Learning Models Help Predict Heart Disease Risk in Women
- Deep-Learning Model Predicts Arrhythmia 30 Minutes before Onset
- Breakthrough Technology Combines Detection and Treatment of Nerve-Related Disorders in Single Procedure