Sterile Gloves Hold No Advantage in the Battle Against SSI
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 16 Aug 2016 |
Image: A new study shows no difference in the rate of postoperative surgical site infection outpatient surgical procedures between sterile and nonsterile gloves (Photo courtesy of the Mayo Clinic).
Researchers at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies to explore SSI rates and determine whether the use of sterile versus nonsterile gloves in outpatient cutaneous procedures affects the rate of postoperative wound infection. Patients in the studies underwent outpatient cutaneous or mucosal surgical procedures, including Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), repair of a laceration, standard excisions, and tooth extractions.
Overall, 14 studies met eligibility and inclusion criteria, with a total of 12,275 patients who underwent outpatient procedures with sterile or nonsterile gloves, and had follow-up regarding SSI. In all, 228 patients (2.1%) were documented as having postoperative SSI, including 107 of 5,031 patients in the nonsterile glove group (2.1%) and 121 of 6,040 patients in the sterile glove group (2.0%). The study was published on August 3, 2016, in JAMA Dermatology.
“When considering surgical practices and guidelines, multiple factors should be considered, including the potential consequences of deviating from accepted sterile glove use and the potential challenges this could cause from a medico-legal standpoint,” concluded lead author Jerry Brewer, MD, and colleagues. “Patient perception of the sterile technique used should also be considered, in addition to the dexterity that comes from wearing a surgical glove that fits snugly, as opposed to a clean glove that gives the surgeon a different feel.”
“Although the broad use of nonsterile clean gloves may be justified, caution is advised in generalizing this justification to more advanced outpatient surgical procedures that may not pertain to the information summarized in this review and meta-analysis,” advised the authors. “Future study could include whether duration of surgery and complexity of the repair influence postoperative SSI development in the setting of sterile versus nonsterile gloves.”
Gloves were first introduced to surgical practice more than a century ago, mostly for hygiene purposes. After that, gloves were mainly used for other reasons, including the prevention of hand dermatitis. During the past few decades, the use of surgical gloves has become standard practice to prevent postoperative wound infections or SSI. But while non-sterile gloves are cheap, coming in boxes of 100 gloves each, sterile gloves are of higher quality, individually packed, and are more expensive.
Related Links:
Mayo Clinic
Overall, 14 studies met eligibility and inclusion criteria, with a total of 12,275 patients who underwent outpatient procedures with sterile or nonsterile gloves, and had follow-up regarding SSI. In all, 228 patients (2.1%) were documented as having postoperative SSI, including 107 of 5,031 patients in the nonsterile glove group (2.1%) and 121 of 6,040 patients in the sterile glove group (2.0%). The study was published on August 3, 2016, in JAMA Dermatology.
“When considering surgical practices and guidelines, multiple factors should be considered, including the potential consequences of deviating from accepted sterile glove use and the potential challenges this could cause from a medico-legal standpoint,” concluded lead author Jerry Brewer, MD, and colleagues. “Patient perception of the sterile technique used should also be considered, in addition to the dexterity that comes from wearing a surgical glove that fits snugly, as opposed to a clean glove that gives the surgeon a different feel.”
“Although the broad use of nonsterile clean gloves may be justified, caution is advised in generalizing this justification to more advanced outpatient surgical procedures that may not pertain to the information summarized in this review and meta-analysis,” advised the authors. “Future study could include whether duration of surgery and complexity of the repair influence postoperative SSI development in the setting of sterile versus nonsterile gloves.”
Gloves were first introduced to surgical practice more than a century ago, mostly for hygiene purposes. After that, gloves were mainly used for other reasons, including the prevention of hand dermatitis. During the past few decades, the use of surgical gloves has become standard practice to prevent postoperative wound infections or SSI. But while non-sterile gloves are cheap, coming in boxes of 100 gloves each, sterile gloves are of higher quality, individually packed, and are more expensive.
Related Links:
Mayo Clinic
Latest Surgical Techniques News
- Miniaturized Ultrasonic Scalpel Enables Faster and Safer Robotic-Assisted Surgery
- AI Assisted Reading Tool for Small Bowel Video Capsule Endoscopy Detects More Lesions
- First-Ever Contact Force Pulsed Field Ablation System to Transform Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias
- Caterpillar Robot with Built-In Steering System Crawls Easily Through Loops and Bends
- Tiny Wraparound Electronic Implants to Revolutionize Treatment of Spinal Cord Injuries
- Small, Implantable Cardiac Pump to Help Children Awaiting Heart Transplant
- Gastrointestinal Imaging Capsule a Game-Changer in Esophagus Surveillance and Treatment
- World’s Smallest Laser Probe for Brain Procedures Facilitates Ablation of Full Range of Targets
- Artificial Intelligence Broadens Diagnostic Abilities of Conventional Coronary Angiography
- AI-Powered Surgical Visualization Tool Supports Surgeons' Visual Recognition in Real Time
- Cutting-Edge Robotic Bronchial Endoscopic System Provides Prompt Intervention during Emergencies
- Handheld Device for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery a Game Changer for Removal of High-Grade Glioma Brain Tumors
- Porous Gel Sponge Facilitates Rapid Hemostasis and Wound Healing
- Novel Rigid Endoscope System Enables Deep Tissue Imaging During Surgery
- Robotic Nerve ‘Cuffs’ Could Treat Various Neurological Conditions
- Flexible Microdisplay Visualizes Brain Activity in Real-Time To Guide Neurosurgeons