Using Mesh for Hernia Repair Shows Mixed Results
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 04 Nov 2016 |
Image: The hernia sac and contents are returned to place and the hernia repaired with mesh (Photo courtesy Dr. G. Tan).
Although mesh reinforcement for hernia repair is associated with several benefits, these are offset by mesh-related complications, claims a new study.
Researchers at Hvidovre Hospital (Denmark) and Zealand University Hospital (Køge, Denmark) conducted a study that included 3,242 patients (average age 59; 53% women), who underwent elective incisional hernia repairs in Denmark from January 2007 to December 2010. Among these, 35% underwent open mesh repair, 11% had open non-mesh repair, and 54% had laparoscopic mesh repair. Median follow-up for all procedures was about five years.
The results showed that the risk of subsequent recurrent hernia was lower for patients with open mesh repair (12%) and for patients with laparoscopic mesh repair (10.6%), than for those who had non-mesh repair (17.1%). A progressively increasing number of mesh-related complications, including bleeding, bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, and late abscess, were also noted. At five years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of mesh-related complications was 5.6% for patients who underwent open mesh hernia repair and 3.7% for patients who underwent laparoscopic mesh repair.
Conversely, the long-term repair-related complication rate for patients with an initial non-mesh repair was 0.8%. The researchers commented, however, that larger, more complicated hernias are likely to be repaired with mesh, while small, simple hernias with little likelihood of long-term problems tend to be repaired without mesh. The study was presented at the American College of Surgeons (ACS) clinical congress, held during October 2016 in Washington (DC, USA).
“Mesh implantation prevented the need for subsequent reoperation in relatively few patients, suggesting that the benefits associated with the use of mesh are partially off¬set by long-term complications associated with its use,” concluded senior author Thue Bisgaard, MD, PhD, of Hvidovre Hospital, and colleagues. “The complete spectrum for the risks and benefits of mesh used to reinforce hernia repair is not known, because there are very few clinical trial data reporting hernia outcomes as they pertain to mesh utilization.”
Related Links:
Hvidovre Hospital
Zealand University Hospital
Researchers at Hvidovre Hospital (Denmark) and Zealand University Hospital (Køge, Denmark) conducted a study that included 3,242 patients (average age 59; 53% women), who underwent elective incisional hernia repairs in Denmark from January 2007 to December 2010. Among these, 35% underwent open mesh repair, 11% had open non-mesh repair, and 54% had laparoscopic mesh repair. Median follow-up for all procedures was about five years.
The results showed that the risk of subsequent recurrent hernia was lower for patients with open mesh repair (12%) and for patients with laparoscopic mesh repair (10.6%), than for those who had non-mesh repair (17.1%). A progressively increasing number of mesh-related complications, including bleeding, bowel obstruction, bowel perforation, and late abscess, were also noted. At five years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of mesh-related complications was 5.6% for patients who underwent open mesh hernia repair and 3.7% for patients who underwent laparoscopic mesh repair.
Conversely, the long-term repair-related complication rate for patients with an initial non-mesh repair was 0.8%. The researchers commented, however, that larger, more complicated hernias are likely to be repaired with mesh, while small, simple hernias with little likelihood of long-term problems tend to be repaired without mesh. The study was presented at the American College of Surgeons (ACS) clinical congress, held during October 2016 in Washington (DC, USA).
“Mesh implantation prevented the need for subsequent reoperation in relatively few patients, suggesting that the benefits associated with the use of mesh are partially off¬set by long-term complications associated with its use,” concluded senior author Thue Bisgaard, MD, PhD, of Hvidovre Hospital, and colleagues. “The complete spectrum for the risks and benefits of mesh used to reinforce hernia repair is not known, because there are very few clinical trial data reporting hernia outcomes as they pertain to mesh utilization.”
Related Links:
Hvidovre Hospital
Zealand University Hospital
Latest Surgical Techniques News
- AI Assisted Reading Tool for Small Bowel Video Capsule Endoscopy Detects More Lesions
- First-Ever Contact Force Pulsed Field Ablation System to Transform Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias
- Caterpillar Robot with Built-In Steering System Crawls Easily Through Loops and Bends
- Tiny Wraparound Electronic Implants to Revolutionize Treatment of Spinal Cord Injuries
- Small, Implantable Cardiac Pump to Help Children Awaiting Heart Transplant
- Gastrointestinal Imaging Capsule a Game-Changer in Esophagus Surveillance and Treatment
- World’s Smallest Laser Probe for Brain Procedures Facilitates Ablation of Full Range of Targets
- Artificial Intelligence Broadens Diagnostic Abilities of Conventional Coronary Angiography
- AI-Powered Surgical Visualization Tool Supports Surgeons' Visual Recognition in Real Time
- Cutting-Edge Robotic Bronchial Endoscopic System Provides Prompt Intervention during Emergencies
- Handheld Device for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery a Game Changer for Removal of High-Grade Glioma Brain Tumors
- Porous Gel Sponge Facilitates Rapid Hemostasis and Wound Healing
- Novel Rigid Endoscope System Enables Deep Tissue Imaging During Surgery
- Robotic Nerve ‘Cuffs’ Could Treat Various Neurological Conditions
- Flexible Microdisplay Visualizes Brain Activity in Real-Time To Guide Neurosurgeons
- Next-Gen Computer Assisted Vacuum Thrombectomy Technology Rapidly Removes Blood Clots