Oncologic Safety of Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery Is Dubious
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 22 Feb 2017 |
Patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal resection (LRR) have increased risk for incomplete tumor excision compared to open surgery, according to a new study.
Researchers at Henri Mondor University Hospital, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, and Rothschild Hospital conducted a meta-analysis of studies to examine the evidence concerning the pathologic outcomes of LRR versus open rectal resection (ORR) for rectal cancer. Of 369 records screened, 14 RCTs were selected for the qualitative and quantitative analyses. Main outcomes and measures included rate of positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) and the quality of mesorectal excision.
The researchers identified a positive CRM in 7.9% and 6.1% percent of patients undergoing LRR and ORR, respectively. In five studies, a noncomplete mesorectal excision occurred in 13.2% and 10.4% of LRR and ORR patients, respectively. There was no significant difference between LRR and ORR in the distal resection margin involvement, the mean number of lymph nodes retrieved, mean distance to the distal margin, and the mean distance to radial margins. The study was published on February 8, 2017, in JAMA Surgery.
“Based on the available evidence, the risk for achieving noncomplete mesorectal excision is significantly higher in patients undergoing LRR, compared with ORR,” concluded lead author Aleix Martínez-Pérez, MD, of Henri Mondor University Hospital, and colleagues. “These findings question the oncologic safety of laparoscopy for the treatment of rectal cancer. However, long-term results of the ongoing RCTs are awaited to assess whether these pathologic results have an effect on disease-free and overall patient survival.”
Total mesorectal excision is used in the treatment of colorectal cancer, during which a significant length of the bowel around the tumor is removed. It involves a low anterior resection for tumors of the middle and the lower rectum, wherein it is essential to remove the rectum along with the mesorectum up to the level of the levators.
Researchers at Henri Mondor University Hospital, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, and Rothschild Hospital conducted a meta-analysis of studies to examine the evidence concerning the pathologic outcomes of LRR versus open rectal resection (ORR) for rectal cancer. Of 369 records screened, 14 RCTs were selected for the qualitative and quantitative analyses. Main outcomes and measures included rate of positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) and the quality of mesorectal excision.
The researchers identified a positive CRM in 7.9% and 6.1% percent of patients undergoing LRR and ORR, respectively. In five studies, a noncomplete mesorectal excision occurred in 13.2% and 10.4% of LRR and ORR patients, respectively. There was no significant difference between LRR and ORR in the distal resection margin involvement, the mean number of lymph nodes retrieved, mean distance to the distal margin, and the mean distance to radial margins. The study was published on February 8, 2017, in JAMA Surgery.
“Based on the available evidence, the risk for achieving noncomplete mesorectal excision is significantly higher in patients undergoing LRR, compared with ORR,” concluded lead author Aleix Martínez-Pérez, MD, of Henri Mondor University Hospital, and colleagues. “These findings question the oncologic safety of laparoscopy for the treatment of rectal cancer. However, long-term results of the ongoing RCTs are awaited to assess whether these pathologic results have an effect on disease-free and overall patient survival.”
Total mesorectal excision is used in the treatment of colorectal cancer, during which a significant length of the bowel around the tumor is removed. It involves a low anterior resection for tumors of the middle and the lower rectum, wherein it is essential to remove the rectum along with the mesorectum up to the level of the levators.
Latest Surgical Techniques News
- AI Assisted Reading Tool for Small Bowel Video Capsule Endoscopy Detects More Lesions
- First-Ever Contact Force Pulsed Field Ablation System to Transform Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias
- Caterpillar Robot with Built-In Steering System Crawls Easily Through Loops and Bends
- Tiny Wraparound Electronic Implants to Revolutionize Treatment of Spinal Cord Injuries
- Small, Implantable Cardiac Pump to Help Children Awaiting Heart Transplant
- Gastrointestinal Imaging Capsule a Game-Changer in Esophagus Surveillance and Treatment
- World’s Smallest Laser Probe for Brain Procedures Facilitates Ablation of Full Range of Targets
- Artificial Intelligence Broadens Diagnostic Abilities of Conventional Coronary Angiography
- AI-Powered Surgical Visualization Tool Supports Surgeons' Visual Recognition in Real Time
- Cutting-Edge Robotic Bronchial Endoscopic System Provides Prompt Intervention during Emergencies
- Handheld Device for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery a Game Changer for Removal of High-Grade Glioma Brain Tumors
- Porous Gel Sponge Facilitates Rapid Hemostasis and Wound Healing
- Novel Rigid Endoscope System Enables Deep Tissue Imaging During Surgery
- Robotic Nerve ‘Cuffs’ Could Treat Various Neurological Conditions
- Flexible Microdisplay Visualizes Brain Activity in Real-Time To Guide Neurosurgeons
- Next-Gen Computer Assisted Vacuum Thrombectomy Technology Rapidly Removes Blood Clots