Bowel Preparation for Colon Surgery Deemed Unnecessary
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 19 Aug 2019 |
A new study concludes that mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation (MOABP) prior to surgery does not reduce infection or overall morbidity rates.
Researchers at Helsinki University Hospital (Finland), Oulu University Hospital (Finland), and other institutions conducted a multicenter study involving 417 patients undergoing colon resection, who were randomly assigned to either MOABP (209 patients) or no bowel preparation (NBP; 208 patients). Patients allocated to MOABP were prepared by drinking two liters of polyethylene glycol and one liter of clear fluid on the day before surgery, together with two grams of neomycin and two grams of metronidazole orally. The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI) within 30 days after surgery.
After exclusions, the results showed that SSI was detected in 13 (7%) of the 196 patients randomized to MOABP, and in 21 (11%) of the 200 patients randomized to NBP. Anastomotic dehiscence was reported in 4% of the patients in both the MOABP and the NBP group, while reoperations were necessary in 8% of the MOABP group, compared with 7% of the NBP patients. Two patients died in the NBP group and none in the MOABP group within 30 days. The study was published on August 8, 2019, in The Lancet.
“According to our findings, there were no differences in treatment outcomes between the groups. Bowel preparation did not reduce surgical site infections or the total number or severity of surgical complications,” said senior author gastrointestinal surgeon Ville Sallinen, MD, of Helsinki University Hospital. “Neither was there any difference in the number of days spent at the hospital. It appears that this stressful procedure provides no benefit to patients.”
SSI is the most common postoperative complication, occurring in approximately 2-5% of patients who undergo clean extra-abdominal surgeries, such as thoracic and orthopedic surgery, and in up to 20% of patients who undergo intra-abdominal surgery interventions. Besides the pain and suffering to patients, it could lead to catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment to those patients who are required to pay for their own treatment, and a significant financial burden on healthcare providers.
Related Links:
Helsinki University Hospital
Oulu University Hospital
Researchers at Helsinki University Hospital (Finland), Oulu University Hospital (Finland), and other institutions conducted a multicenter study involving 417 patients undergoing colon resection, who were randomly assigned to either MOABP (209 patients) or no bowel preparation (NBP; 208 patients). Patients allocated to MOABP were prepared by drinking two liters of polyethylene glycol and one liter of clear fluid on the day before surgery, together with two grams of neomycin and two grams of metronidazole orally. The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI) within 30 days after surgery.
After exclusions, the results showed that SSI was detected in 13 (7%) of the 196 patients randomized to MOABP, and in 21 (11%) of the 200 patients randomized to NBP. Anastomotic dehiscence was reported in 4% of the patients in both the MOABP and the NBP group, while reoperations were necessary in 8% of the MOABP group, compared with 7% of the NBP patients. Two patients died in the NBP group and none in the MOABP group within 30 days. The study was published on August 8, 2019, in The Lancet.
“According to our findings, there were no differences in treatment outcomes between the groups. Bowel preparation did not reduce surgical site infections or the total number or severity of surgical complications,” said senior author gastrointestinal surgeon Ville Sallinen, MD, of Helsinki University Hospital. “Neither was there any difference in the number of days spent at the hospital. It appears that this stressful procedure provides no benefit to patients.”
SSI is the most common postoperative complication, occurring in approximately 2-5% of patients who undergo clean extra-abdominal surgeries, such as thoracic and orthopedic surgery, and in up to 20% of patients who undergo intra-abdominal surgery interventions. Besides the pain and suffering to patients, it could lead to catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment to those patients who are required to pay for their own treatment, and a significant financial burden on healthcare providers.
Related Links:
Helsinki University Hospital
Oulu University Hospital
Latest Surgical Techniques News
- AR Surgical Technology Translates Complex 2D Medical Imaging to Enhance Accuracy
- Miniaturized Snake-Like Probe Images Cerebral Arteries From Within
- Miniaturized Implantable Multi-Sensors Device to Monitor Vessels Health
- Tiny Robots Made Out Of Carbon Could Conduct Colonoscopy, Pelvic Exam or Blood Test
- Miniaturized Ultrasonic Scalpel Enables Faster and Safer Robotic-Assisted Surgery
- AI Assisted Reading Tool for Small Bowel Video Capsule Endoscopy Detects More Lesions
- First-Ever Contact Force Pulsed Field Ablation System to Transform Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias
- Caterpillar Robot with Built-In Steering System Crawls Easily Through Loops and Bends
- Tiny Wraparound Electronic Implants to Revolutionize Treatment of Spinal Cord Injuries
- Small, Implantable Cardiac Pump to Help Children Awaiting Heart Transplant
- Gastrointestinal Imaging Capsule a Game-Changer in Esophagus Surveillance and Treatment
- World’s Smallest Laser Probe for Brain Procedures Facilitates Ablation of Full Range of Targets
- Artificial Intelligence Broadens Diagnostic Abilities of Conventional Coronary Angiography
- AI-Powered Surgical Visualization Tool Supports Surgeons' Visual Recognition in Real Time
- Cutting-Edge Robotic Bronchial Endoscopic System Provides Prompt Intervention during Emergencies
- Handheld Device for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery a Game Changer for Removal of High-Grade Glioma Brain Tumors