Axillary Vein Approach Superior for ICD Leads Placement
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 21 Jul 2020 |
Ultrasound guided axillary vein puncture (USAX) bests cephalic vein (CV) dissection via cut-down for pacemaker and defibrillator lead insertion, according to a new study.
Researchers at Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS; Porto Alegre, Brazil), and Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA; Porto Alegre, Brazil) conducted a prospective, multicenter trial that included 88 adults (median age 70.5 years, 60.2% male), randomized on a 1:1 basis to either USAX or CV. The primary endpoint was defined as success rate, with secondary endpoints including venous access site change, time to obtain venous access, total procedural time, and early complication rate.
The results revealed that for the primary outcome, a higher success rate was observed in the USAX group (97.7%) than in the CV group (54.5%), as well as a lower rate of venous access site change (2.3% versus 40.9%), shorter time to obtain venous access (five minutes versus 15 minutes), and procedural time (40 minutes versus 51 minutes), with no statistical difference found in the overall complication rate (2.3% vs 11.4%). The study was published on April 29, 2020, in Heart Rhythm.
“Ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture for implantation of pacemaker or defibrillator leads is a good first-line or alternative approach when, for example, the cephalic vein is absent or unsuitable for insertion of multiple leads,” said lead author Ana Paula Tagliari, MD, MSc, of HCPA. “Given its short procedure time, the axillary vein approach may allow a faster patient turnover. And the axillary vein itself has several advantages over the cephalic vein, including extrathoracic location, larger caliber, and greater distance from an artery.”
Both pacemakers and implantable cardiac devices (ICDs) have a pulse generator that fits below the collarbone, secured in a pocket under the skin, but above the muscle. The pulse generator sends pulses to send to the heart muscles via electrical leads that run through a selected large vein. The tip of a lead is anchored to a specific section of heart muscle; the rest of the lead floats freely (at least at first). Some devices have one lead, most have two, and a small but growing number have three.
Related Links:
Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Researchers at Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS; Porto Alegre, Brazil), and Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA; Porto Alegre, Brazil) conducted a prospective, multicenter trial that included 88 adults (median age 70.5 years, 60.2% male), randomized on a 1:1 basis to either USAX or CV. The primary endpoint was defined as success rate, with secondary endpoints including venous access site change, time to obtain venous access, total procedural time, and early complication rate.
The results revealed that for the primary outcome, a higher success rate was observed in the USAX group (97.7%) than in the CV group (54.5%), as well as a lower rate of venous access site change (2.3% versus 40.9%), shorter time to obtain venous access (five minutes versus 15 minutes), and procedural time (40 minutes versus 51 minutes), with no statistical difference found in the overall complication rate (2.3% vs 11.4%). The study was published on April 29, 2020, in Heart Rhythm.
“Ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture for implantation of pacemaker or defibrillator leads is a good first-line or alternative approach when, for example, the cephalic vein is absent or unsuitable for insertion of multiple leads,” said lead author Ana Paula Tagliari, MD, MSc, of HCPA. “Given its short procedure time, the axillary vein approach may allow a faster patient turnover. And the axillary vein itself has several advantages over the cephalic vein, including extrathoracic location, larger caliber, and greater distance from an artery.”
Both pacemakers and implantable cardiac devices (ICDs) have a pulse generator that fits below the collarbone, secured in a pocket under the skin, but above the muscle. The pulse generator sends pulses to send to the heart muscles via electrical leads that run through a selected large vein. The tip of a lead is anchored to a specific section of heart muscle; the rest of the lead floats freely (at least at first). Some devices have one lead, most have two, and a small but growing number have three.
Related Links:
Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Latest Surgical Techniques News
- Porous Gel Sponge Facilitates Rapid Hemostasis and Wound Healing
- Novel Rigid Endoscope System Enables Deep Tissue Imaging During Surgery
- Robotic Nerve ‘Cuffs’ Could Treat Various Neurological Conditions
- Flexible Microdisplay Visualizes Brain Activity in Real-Time To Guide Neurosurgeons
- Next-Gen Computer Assisted Vacuum Thrombectomy Technology Rapidly Removes Blood Clots
- Hydrogel-Based Miniaturized Electric Generators to Power Biomedical Devices
- Custom 3D-Printed Orthopedic Implants Transform Joint Replacement Surgery
- Wearable Technology Monitors and Analyzes Surgeons' Posture during Long Surgical Procedures
- Cutting-Edge Imaging Platform Detects Residual Breast Cancer Missed During Lumpectomy Surgery
- Computational Models Predict Heart Valve Leakage in Children
- Breakthrough Device Enables Clear and Real-Time Visual Guidance for Effective Cardiovascular Interventions
- World’s First Microscopic Probe to Revolutionize Early Cancer Diagnosis
- World’s Smallest Implantable Brain Stimulator Demonstrated in Human Patient
- Robotically Assisted Lung Transplants Could Soon Become a Reality
- AI to Provide Heart Transplant Surgeons with New Decision-Making Data
- New Surgical Tool Empowers Precision and Confidence in Operating Room