Gilead’s Remdesivir Has Little or No Effect on Survival of COVID-19 Patients, Finds WHO’s Solidarity Trial
By HospiMedica International staff writers Posted on 19 Oct 2020 |
Illustration
The world’s largest randomized control trial on COVID-19 therapeutics has found that Gilead Sciences’ (Foster City, CA, USA) antiviral drug remdesivir had no significant effect on the chances of survival of infected patients.
The World Health Organization’s (WHO) SOLIDARITY Trial that studied remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon regimens found that none of them “substantially affected mortality” or reduced the need for a ventilator. They appeared to have little or no effect on 28-day mortality or the in-hospital course of COVID-19 among hospitalized patients. However, Gilead has said that the WHO’s findings appeared inconsistent with evidence from other studies validating the clinical benefit of remdesivir.
Recently published final results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 ACTT-1 trial of remdesivir had demonstrated that treatment with the investigational antiviral resulted in a faster time to recovery than previously reported in adults hospitalized with mild-moderate or severe COVID-19. The results of the final ACTT-1 study conducted by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) build on the preliminary results published in May 2020, showing that treatment with remdesivir resulted in consistent, clinically meaningful improvements across multiple outcome assessments compared with placebo in COVID-19 patients. The final results demonstrated that treatment with remdesivir resulted in a faster time to recovery than previously reported.
In its company statement, Gilead said that it was unclear if any conclusive findings could be drawn from the WHO’s study results. Gilead also expressed concern that the data from the WHO’s open-label global trial had not undergone the rigorous review required to allow for constructive scientific discussion, particularly given the limitations of the trial design.
“The emerging data appear inconsistent with more robust evidence from multiple randomized, controlled studies published in peer-reviewed journals validating the clinical benefit of remdesivir. We are concerned that the data from this open-label global trial have not undergone the rigorous review required to allow for constructive scientific discussion, particularly given the limitations of the trial design,” Gilead said in its statement.
Related Links:
Gilead Sciences
The World Health Organization’s (WHO) SOLIDARITY Trial that studied remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon regimens found that none of them “substantially affected mortality” or reduced the need for a ventilator. They appeared to have little or no effect on 28-day mortality or the in-hospital course of COVID-19 among hospitalized patients. However, Gilead has said that the WHO’s findings appeared inconsistent with evidence from other studies validating the clinical benefit of remdesivir.
Recently published final results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 ACTT-1 trial of remdesivir had demonstrated that treatment with the investigational antiviral resulted in a faster time to recovery than previously reported in adults hospitalized with mild-moderate or severe COVID-19. The results of the final ACTT-1 study conducted by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) build on the preliminary results published in May 2020, showing that treatment with remdesivir resulted in consistent, clinically meaningful improvements across multiple outcome assessments compared with placebo in COVID-19 patients. The final results demonstrated that treatment with remdesivir resulted in a faster time to recovery than previously reported.
In its company statement, Gilead said that it was unclear if any conclusive findings could be drawn from the WHO’s study results. Gilead also expressed concern that the data from the WHO’s open-label global trial had not undergone the rigorous review required to allow for constructive scientific discussion, particularly given the limitations of the trial design.
“The emerging data appear inconsistent with more robust evidence from multiple randomized, controlled studies published in peer-reviewed journals validating the clinical benefit of remdesivir. We are concerned that the data from this open-label global trial have not undergone the rigorous review required to allow for constructive scientific discussion, particularly given the limitations of the trial design,” Gilead said in its statement.
Related Links:
Gilead Sciences
Latest COVID-19 News
- Low-Cost System Detects SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Hospital Air Using High-Tech Bubbles
- World's First Inhalable COVID-19 Vaccine Approved in China
- COVID-19 Vaccine Patch Fights SARS-CoV-2 Variants Better than Needles
- Blood Viscosity Testing Can Predict Risk of Death in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients
- ‘Covid Computer’ Uses AI to Detect COVID-19 from Chest CT Scans
- MRI Lung-Imaging Technique Shows Cause of Long-COVID Symptoms
- Chest CT Scans of COVID-19 Patients Could Help Distinguish Between SARS-CoV-2 Variants
- Specialized MRI Detects Lung Abnormalities in Non-Hospitalized Long COVID Patients
- AI Algorithm Identifies Hospitalized Patients at Highest Risk of Dying From COVID-19
- Sweat Sensor Detects Key Biomarkers That Provide Early Warning of COVID-19 and Flu
- Study Assesses Impact of COVID-19 on Ventilation/Perfusion Scintigraphy
- CT Imaging Study Finds Vaccination Reduces Risk of COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Embolism
- Third Day in Hospital a ‘Tipping Point’ in Severity of COVID-19 Pneumonia
- Longer Interval Between COVID-19 Vaccines Generates Up to Nine Times as Many Antibodies
- AI Model for Monitoring COVID-19 Predicts Mortality Within First 30 Days of Admission
- AI Predicts COVID Prognosis at Near-Expert Level Based Off CT Scans